Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 May;43(4):413-33.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0.

A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation

Affiliations
Review

A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation

Dagmar Haase et al. Ambio. 2014 May.

Abstract

Although a number of comprehensive reviews have examined global ecosystem services (ES), few have focused on studies that assess urban ecosystem services (UES). Given that more than half of the world's population lives in cities, understanding the dualism of the provision of and need for UES is of critical importance. Which UES are the focus of research, and what types of urban land use are examined? Are models or decision support systems used to assess the provision of UES? Are trade-offs considered? Do studies of UES engage stakeholders? To address these questions, we analyzed 217 papers derived from an ISI Web of Knowledge search using a set of standardized criteria. The results indicate that most UES studies have been undertaken in Europe, North America, and China, at city scale. Assessment methods involve bio-physical models, Geographical Information Systems, and valuation, but few study findings have been implemented as land use policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Geographic distribution of 217 UES studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of articles published on UES between 1973 and 2012 (N = 217)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Type of ecosystem services analyzed (% of 217 entries)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Service providing units analyzed sorted according to the number (% of 217 entries)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Models used to analyze and assess UES demand and provisioning (% of 217 entries)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Stakeholders involved in UES analysis and assessment (% of 217 entries)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Methods of implementation of UES valuation (% of 217 entries)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abd-Elrahman AH, Thornhill ME, Andreu MG, Escobedo F. A community-based urban forest inventory using online mapping services and consumer-grade digital images. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2010;12:249–260.
    1. Alberti M. Modeling the urban ecosystem: a conceptual framework. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 1999;26:605–630.
    1. Ambrey CL, Fleming CM. Valuing scenic amenity using life satisfaction data. Ecological Economics. 2011;72:106–115.
    1. Andersson E, Barthel S, Ahrné K. Measuring social–ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecological Applications. 2007;17:1267–1278. - PubMed
    1. Angold PG, Sadler JP, Hill M, Pullin O, Rushton S, Austin K, Small E, et al. Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. The Science of the Total Environment. 2006;360:196–204. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources