Physicians' propensity to discuss prognosis is associated with patients' awareness of prognosis for metastatic cancers
- PMID: 24742212
- PMCID: PMC4038989
- DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0460
Physicians' propensity to discuss prognosis is associated with patients' awareness of prognosis for metastatic cancers
Abstract
Background: Prognosis discussion is an essential component of informed decision-making. However, many terminally ill patients have a limited awareness of their prognosis and the causes are unclear.
Objective: To explore the impact of physicians' propensity to discuss prognosis on advanced cancer patients' prognosis awareness.
Design: Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium (CanCORS) study, a prospective cohort study with patient and physician surveys.
Setting/subjects: We investigated 686 patients with metastatic lung or colorectal cancer at diagnosis who participated in the CanCORS study and reported about their life expectancy. Data were linked to the physician survey from 486 physicians who were identified by these patients as filling important roles in their cancer care.
Results: Few patients with metastatic cancers (16.5%) reported an accurate awareness of their prognosis, defined as reporting a life expectancy of less than 2 years for lung cancer or less than 5 years for colorectal cancer. Patients whose most-important-doctor (in helping patient make decisions) reported discussing prognosis with terminally ill patients earlier were more likely than those whose doctors deferred these discussions to have an accurate prognosis awareness (adjusted proportion, 18.5% versus 7.6%; odds ratio, 3.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-7.52; p=0.006).
Conclusions: Few patients with advanced cancer could articulate an accurate prognosis estimate, despite most having received chemotherapy and many physicians reported they would discuss prognosis early. Physicians' propensity to discuss prognosis earlier was associated with more accurate patient reports of prognosis. Enhancing the communication skills of providers with important roles in cancer care may help to improve cancer patients' understanding of their prognosis.
Figures
References
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Palliative Care, Version 2.2013. www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/palliative.pdf (Last accessed July31, 2013) - PubMed
-
- National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative, ThirdEdition. www.nationalconsensusproject.org (Last accessed July31, 2013)
-
- Peppercorn JM, Smith TJ, Helft PR, Debono DJ, Berry SR, Wollins DS, Hayes DM, Von Roenn JH, Schnipper LE; American Society of Clinical Oncology: American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: Toward individualized care for patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:755–760 - PubMed
-
- Weeks JC, Cook EF, O'Day SJ, Peterson LM, Wenger N, Reding D, Harrell FE, Kussin P, Dawson NV, Connors AF, Jr, Lynn J, Phillips RS: Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA 1998;279:1709–1714 - PubMed
-
- Temel JS, Greer JA, Admane S, Gallagher ER, Jackson VA, Lynch TJ, Lennes IT, Dahlin CM, Pirl WF: Longitudinal perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: Results of a randomized study of early palliative care. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2319–2326 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
