Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;22(12):1513-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

Delirium diagnosis methodology used in research: a survey-based study

Karin J Neufeld  1 , Archana Nelliot  2 , Sharon K Inouye  3 , E Wesley Ely  4 , O Joseph Bienvenu  5 , Hochang Benjamin Lee  6 , Dale M Needham  7
Affiliations

Delirium diagnosis methodology used in research: a survey-based study

Karin J Neufeld et al. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To describe methodology used to diagnose delirium in research studies evaluating delirium detection tools.

Methods: The authors used a survey to address reference rater methodology for delirium diagnosis, including rater characteristics, sources of patient information, and diagnostic process, completed via web or telephone interview according to respondent preference. Participants were authors of 39 studies included in three recent systematic reviews of delirium detection instruments in hospitalized patients.

Results: Authors from 85% (N = 33) of the 39 eligible studies responded to the survey. The median number of raters per study was 2.5 (interquartile range: 2-3); 79% were physicians. The raters' median duration of clinical experience with delirium diagnosis was 7 years (interquartile range: 4-10), with 5% having no prior clinical experience. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated in 70% of studies. Cognitive tests and delirium detection tools were used in the delirium reference rating process in 61% (N = 21) and 45% (N = 15) of studies, respectively, with 33% (N = 11) using both and 27% (N = 9) using neither. When patients were too drowsy or declined to participate in delirium evaluation, 70% of studies (N = 23) used all available information for delirium diagnosis, whereas 15% excluded such patients.

Conclusion: Significant variability exists in reference standard methods for delirium diagnosis in published research. Increasing standardization by documenting inter-rater reliability, using standardized cognitive and delirium detection tools, incorporating diagnostic expert consensus panels, and using all available information in patients declining or unable to participate with formal testing may help advance delirium research by increasing consistency of case detection and improving generalizability of research results.

Keywords: Delirium; amnestic; cognitive disorders; data collection; dementia; reference standards; research design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest:

Dr. Neufeld receives funding from a grant by Ornim Medical Device manufacturers.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sources of Information for Reference Raters’ Delirium Evaluation (n=33 studies)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Information Used in Reference Raters’ Delirium Diagnosis (n=33 studies)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association, American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Task Force; Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Arlington, Va: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
    1. Marcantonio ER. In the clinic. Delirium. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:ITC6-1–16. - PubMed
    1. Leslie DL, Inouye SK. The importance of delirium: economic and societal costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59 (Suppl 2):S241–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudolph JL, Marcantonio ER. Review articles: postoperative delirium: acute change with long-term implications. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1202–1211. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomason JW, Shintani A, Peterson JF, et al. Intensive care unit delirium is an independent predictor of longer hospital stay: a prospective analysis of 261 non-ventilated patients. Crit Care. 2005;9:R375–81. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types