Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;100(4):409-12.
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

Functional interest of an articulating spacer in two-stage infected total knee arthroplasty revision

Affiliations
Free article

Functional interest of an articulating spacer in two-stage infected total knee arthroplasty revision

T Classen et al. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: Deep periprosthetic infection is one of the most serious complications after total knee replacement. The two-stage procedure with implantation of a temporary cement spacer and later re-implantation of a revision total knee prosthesis is an accepted procedural standard. The use of articulating spacers has been proposed to enhance ease of revision and functional results.

Patients and methods: Twenty-three patients treated with an articulating spacer were retrospectively studied. All patients had undergone a two-stage surgery. The infected prosthesis was explanted and the femoral component was sterilized and re-implanted. On the tibial side a block of gentamicin-loaded bone cement was produced intraoperatively using specially manufactured templates. Eighteen total knee arthroplasty revisions and 5 arthrodesis were finally performed.

Results: A total of three (13%) re-infections occurred 5-20 months after revision total knee arthroplasty in a mean follow-up period of 47 months. Prior to re-implantation, flexion with the articulating spacer ranged between 15 and 100° (mean 68±28°). The average postoperative flexion after re-implantation of total knee replacement was 105±11°.

Conclusion: The articulating spacer used in this study appears to be as effective as the standard procedures in terms of re-infection risk rate and postoperative range of motion recovery.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

Keywords: Articulating spacer; Infection; Knee; Total knee arthroplasty; Two-stage revision.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources