Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Jul;80(13):3982-91.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00348-14. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

Distributions of Salmonella subtypes differ between two U.S. produce-growing regions

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Distributions of Salmonella subtypes differ between two U.S. produce-growing regions

Laura K Strawn et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Salmonella accounts for approximately 50% of produce-associated outbreaks in the United States, several of which have been traced back to contamination in the produce production environment. To quantify Salmonella diversity and aid in identification of Salmonella contamination sources, we characterized Salmonella isolates from two geographically diverse produce-growing regions in the United States. Initially, we characterized the Salmonella serotype and subtype diversity associated with 1,677 samples collected from 33 produce farms in New York State (NYS). Among these 1,677 samples, 74 were Salmonella positive, yielding 80 unique isolates (from 147 total isolates), which represented 14 serovars and 23 different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) types. To explore regional Salmonella diversity associated with production environments, we collected a smaller set of samples (n = 65) from South Florida (SFL) production environments and compared the Salmonella diversity associated with these samples with the diversity found among NYS production environments. Among these 65 samples, 23 were Salmonella positive, yielding 32 unique isolates (from 81 total isolates), which represented 11 serovars and 17 different PFGE types. The most common serovars isolated in NYS were Salmonella enterica serovars Newport, Cerro, and Thompson, while common serovars isolated in SFL were Salmonella serovars Saphra and Newport and S. enterica subsp. diarizonae serovar 50:r:z. High PFGE type diversity (Simpson's diversity index, 0.90 ± 0.02) was observed among Salmonella isolates across both regions; only three PFGE types were shared between the two regions. The probability of three or fewer shared PFGE types was <0.000001; therefore, Salmonella isolates were considerably different between the two sampled regions. These findings suggest the potential for PFGE-based source tracking of Salmonella in production environments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
XbaI PFGE patterns for the representative 112 Salmonella isolates from environmental samples obtained from New York State and South Florida produce production environments. Band sizes (kb) are displayed at the top of the PFGE pattern images. The PFGE pattern order displayed is the result of BioNumerics similarity analyses using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean algorithm (UPGMA) and the Dice correlation coefficient with a maximum space tolerance of 1.5%. ID is the isolate designation, serovar is the serovar confirmed by the traditional or molecular method, Cornell XbaI # is the PFGE type assigned by comparison of PFGE patterns to the Cornell University Food Safety Laboratory (CUFSL; Ithaca, NY) database of 6,000 Salmonella isolates, data set indicates the study origin for the isolate, region is New York State (NYS) or South Florida (SFL), and source is the type of sample for the isolate. Salmonella serovars discussed in the text are labeled by color: green, Newport; purple, Saphra, blue, Thompson; orange, Cerro. Boxes represent isolates from NYS and SFL that share PFGE types: dashed box, NYCU.JAAX01.1221 (Salmonella serovar Newport); solid box, NYCU.JAAX01.0157 (Salmonella serovar Thompson); dotted box, NYCU.JAAX01.1199 (Salmonella serovar Thompson).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grimont PAD, Weill F-X. 2007. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars, 9th ed. WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella, Paris, France
    1. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, Roy SL, Jones JL, Griffin PM. 2011. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17:7–15. 10.3201/eid1701.P11101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frenzen PD, Riggs TL, Buzby JC, Breuer T, Roberts T, Voetsch D, Reddy S. 1999. Salmonella cost estimate updated using FoodNet data. Food Rev. 22:10–15
    1. Hanning IB, Nutt JD, Ricke SC. 2009. Salmonellosis outbreaks in the United States due to fresh produce: sources and potential intervention measures. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 6:635–648. 10.1089/fpd.2008.0232 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sivapalasingam S, Friedman CR, Cohen L, Tauxe RV. 2004. Fresh produce: a growing cause of outbreaks of foodborne illness in the United States, 1973 through 1997. J. Food Prot. 67:2342–2353 - PubMed

Publication types