Analysis of microscopic tumor spread patterns according to gross morphologies and suggestions for optimal resection margins in bile duct cancer
- PMID: 24748341
- DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2518-0
Analysis of microscopic tumor spread patterns according to gross morphologies and suggestions for optimal resection margins in bile duct cancer
Abstract
Background/purpose: Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancer, but guidelines for optimal resection margins have not yet been established. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the patterns of microscopic tumor spreads and their lengths according to gross morphology and to suggest optimal resection margins for EHBD cancer.
Methods: A total of 79 patients with EHBD cancers who underwent curative resection at Seoul National University Hospital between 2007 and 2010 were reviewed. Pathologic findings were reviewed by a single specialized pathologist.
Results: Mucosal and mural/perimural spreads were seen in 37.3 and 62.3 %, respectively. The mean length of tumor spreads in the papillary (n = 13), nodular/nodular infiltrative (n = 43), and sclerosing types (n = 23) were 4.5 ± 6.3, 1.8 ± 6.4, and 6.4 ± 6.7 mm, respectively. Spread patterns correlated with gross morphologies (P < 0.001). The lengths of tumor spreads at the 90th percentile were 15.6, 10.0, and 15.6 mm, respectively.
Conclusions: The patterns of tumor spreads correlated with gross morphologies. Optimal resection margins in EHBD cancers should be 16 mm in the papillary and sclerosing types and 10 mm in the nodular/nodular infiltrative type.
Similar articles
-
Confinement to the intrapancreatic bile duct is independently associated with a better prognosis in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 24;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0444-1. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 26911927 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical management of infrahilar/suprapancreatic cholangiocarcinoma: an analysis of the surgical procedures, surgical margins, and survivals of 77 patients.J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Feb;14(2):335-43. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1072-7. Epub 2009 Nov 10. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010. PMID: 19902311
-
Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct: mode of spread and its prognostic implications.Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Sep-Oct;44(17):1256-61. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997. PMID: 9356836
-
[Criteria for the resectability of malignant extrahepatic bile duct tumours].Zentralbl Chir. 2012 Feb;137(1):32-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283887. Epub 2012 Feb 16. Zentralbl Chir. 2012. PMID: 22344835 Review. German.
-
Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: current surgical strategy.Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2009 Apr;18(2):269-88, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2008.12.003. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2009. PMID: 19306812 Review.
Cited by
-
[Frozen sections in hepatobiliary surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 May;96(5):378-384. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02264-5. Epub 2025 Mar 14. Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025. PMID: 40085225 Review. German.
-
Comparison of the Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Intraductal Papillary Neoplasm of the Bile Duct according to Morphological and Anatomical Classifications.J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Sep 17;33(42):e266. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e266. eCollection 2018 Oct 15. J Korean Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 30310366 Free PMC article.
-
An atlas for clinical target volume definition, including elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy of biliary cancer.Oncol Lett. 2019 Feb;17(2):1784-1790. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9774. Epub 2018 Nov 28. Oncol Lett. 2019. PMID: 30675238 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical