Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;21(5):505-10.
doi: 10.1007/s10140-014-1222-4. Epub 2014 Apr 20.

Diagnostic performance of CT esophagography in patients with suspected esophageal rupture

Affiliations

Diagnostic performance of CT esophagography in patients with suspected esophageal rupture

Tatiana Suarez-Poveda et al. Emerg Radiol. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Esophageal rupture is a surgical catastrophe. The gold standard for diagnosing is iodine, water-soluble contrast medium esophagography. CT esophagography has shown promising results. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of CT esophagography in patients with a suspicion of esophageal rupture. This prospective study assessed the performance of a diagnostic test and was approved by local IRB committee. Patients who presented with a clinical suspicion of esophageal rupture were included. CT esophagography findings were described by the emergency radiologist. Clinical outcomes (presence or absence of esophageal rupture) were reported by surgeons. The operative characteristics were calculated. A final predictive scale for rupture was built. A total of 64 patients were recruited (age 26.5 years, 90 % male, 82 % trauma). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) were 77.7 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 45-100), 94.3 % (87.2-100), 14 (9.81-19.9), and 0.24 (0.05-1.22), respectively. The final model for predicting rupture included five variables: age (odds ratio (OR) 1.03; 95 % CI, 0.95-1.11; p=0.04), leakage of contrast media into the mediastinum or pleural space (OR 10.0; 95 % CI, 0.64-156.9; p=0.10), extraluminal air or fluid collections (OR 43.1; 95 % CI, 1.52-1217.3; p=0.027), esophageal wall thickening (OR 10.1; 95 % CI, 0.50-202.8; p=0.12), and left pneumothorax or pleural effusion (OR 6.5; 95 % CI, 0.31-132.7; p=0.2). The overall agreement was 0.40 (95 % CI, 0.09-0.72) for the predictive model. The model sensitivity was 50.0 %, and the specificity was 98.4 %. CT esophagography shows a good diagnostic performance in patients with a suspected esophageal rupture.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1952 Sep;95(3):345-56 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2005 Jun;241(6):1016-21 ;discussion 1021-3 - PubMed
    1. South Med J. 2003 Feb;96(2):158-63 - PubMed
    1. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003 Nov;41(6):1095-115, v - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 May;182(5):1177-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources