Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Dec;399(8):981-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1191-9. Epub 2014 Apr 20.

Current strategies for immunosuppression following liver transplantation

Affiliations
Review

Current strategies for immunosuppression following liver transplantation

Daniel Nils Gotthardt et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Background: New strategies for immunosuppression (IS) after liver transplantation (LTx) are in part responsible for the increased patient and graft survival seen over time. With a few basic exceptions-notably the continued use of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs)-IS drugs and regimens being used today are different from those used 30 years ago. While graft loss due to acute or chronic rejection has become rare, the side effect burden of IS drugs exerts a significant toll on patients.

Concepts/trends: CNIs continue to form the backbone of IS regimens, although their use is hampered by nephrotoxicity and other adverse effects. Consequently, a variety of CNI reduction or withdrawal strategies have formed the basis of clinical trials or entered into clinical practice. These trials have included the use of everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, and anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies. Basiliximab, as well as other lymphocyte nondepleting and depleting agents, have shown benefit in induction regimens.

Summary: Along with steroid reduction or elimination, current strategies for IS after LTx continue to explore novel combinations of agents, with an aim toward striking a balance between diminution of rejection and the need for avoiding adverse effects of the IS drugs. Long-term maintenance strategies are also discussed in this review, as is development of tolerance and antibody-mediated rejection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cancer Med. 2013 Dec;2(6):862-71 - PubMed
    1. Liver Transpl. 2013 Jul;19(7):675-89 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2012 Jan 18;307(3):283-93 - PubMed
    1. Am J Transplant. 2010 Oct;10(10):2313-23 - PubMed
    1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;(3):CD008852 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources