Factors predicting rotator cuff retears: an analysis of 1000 consecutive rotator cuff repairs
- PMID: 24748610
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546514525336
Factors predicting rotator cuff retears: an analysis of 1000 consecutive rotator cuff repairs
Abstract
Background: The rate of retears after rotator cuff repair varies from 11% to 94%. A retear is associated with poorer subjective and objective clinical outcomes than intact repair.
Purpose: This study was designed to determine which preoperative and/or intraoperative factors held the greatest association with retears after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated 1000 consecutive patients who had undergone a primary rotator cuff repair by a single surgeon using an arthroscopic inverted-mattress knotless technique and who had undergone an ultrasound evaluation 6 months after surgery to assess repair integrity. Exclusion criteria included previous rotator cuff repair on the same shoulder, incomplete repair, and repair using a synthetic polytetrafluoroethylene patch. All patients had completed the modified L'Insalata Questionnaire and underwent a clinical examination before surgery. Measurements of tear size, tear thickness, associated shoulder injury, tissue quality, and tendon mobility were recorded intraoperatively.
Results: The overall retear rate at 6 months after surgery was 17%. Retears occurred in 27% of full-thickness tears and 5% of partial-thickness tears (P < .0001). The best independent predictors of retears were anteroposterior tear length (correlation coefficient r = 0.41, P < .0001), tear size area (r = 0.40, P < .0001), mediolateral tear length (r = 0.34, P < .0001), tear thickness (r = 0.29, P < .0001), age at surgery (r = 0.27, P < .0001), and operative time (r = 0.18, P < .0001). These factors produced a predictive model for retears: logit P = (0.039 × age at surgery in years) + (0.027 × tear thickness in %) + (1 × anteroposterior tear length in cm) + (0.76 × mediolateral tear length in cm) - (0.17 × tear size area in cm(2)) + (0.018 × operative time in minutes) -9.7. Logit P can be transformed into P, which is the chance of retears at 6 months after surgery.
Conclusion: A rotator cuff retear is a multifactorial process with no single preoperative or intraoperative factor being overwhelmingly predictive of it. Nevertheless, rotator cuff tear size (tear dimensions, tear size area, and tear thickness) showed stronger associations with retears at 6 months after surgery than did measures of tissue quality and concomitant shoulder injuries.
Keywords: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; retear; rotator cuff tear; shoulder.
Similar articles
-
Intraoperative determinants of rotator cuff repair integrity: an analysis of 500 consecutive repairs.Am J Sports Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):2771-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546512462677. Epub 2012 Oct 25. Am J Sports Med. 2012. PMID: 23104609
-
The Relationship Between Intraoperative Tear Dimensions and Postoperative Pain in 1624 Consecutive Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs.Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(4):788-793. doi: 10.1177/0363546516675168. Epub 2016 Dec 19. Am J Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 28125897
-
Clinical Outcomes of Modified Mason-Allen Single-Row Repair for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison With the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique.Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1976-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587718. Epub 2015 Jun 8. Am J Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 26055919
-
Structural integrity after rotator cuff repair does not correlate with patient function and pain: a meta-analysis.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19;96(4):265-71. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00265. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014. PMID: 24553881
-
The timing of retears after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Nov;26(11):2054-2059. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Sep 13. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017. PMID: 28918111 Review.
Cited by
-
VEGFA-Enriched Exosomes from Tendon-Derived Stem Cells Facilitate Tenocyte Differentiation, Migration, and Transition to a Fibroblastic Phenotype.Biomed Res Int. 2022 Sep 9;2022:8537959. doi: 10.1155/2022/8537959. eCollection 2022. Biomed Res Int. 2022. PMID: 36119932 Free PMC article.
-
Biologic augmentation of rotator cuff repair with microfragmented autologous subacromial bursal tissue enveloped in a patch of compressed autologous long head of biceps tendon tissue: the Bio-Ravioli technique.JSES Int. 2024 May 6;8(5):1010-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.04.013. eCollection 2024 Sep. JSES Int. 2024. PMID: 39280168 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of Return to Work Following Primary Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: An Analysis of 1502 Cases.Am J Sports Med. 2023 Mar;51(4):893-900. doi: 10.1177/03635465231152479. Epub 2023 Feb 20. Am J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 36803077 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of 4 Different 4-Strand Core Suturing Techniques for Flexor Tendon Laceration: An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Study.Hand (N Y). 2023 Jul;18(5):820-828. doi: 10.1177/15589447211073831. Epub 2022 Feb 8. Hand (N Y). 2023. PMID: 35132896 Free PMC article.
-
"Functional outcomes and MRI-based tendon healing after (antero-) superior rotator cuff repair among patients under 50 years: retrospective analysis of traumatic versus non-traumatic rotator cuff tears".BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jan 21;24(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06174-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 36670374 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical