Results from an international multicenter trial evaluating the ease-of-use of and preference for a newly developed disposable injection pen for the treatment of growth hormone deficiency in treatment-naïve children and adults
- PMID: 24748824
- PMCID: PMC3990392
- DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S59821
Results from an international multicenter trial evaluating the ease-of-use of and preference for a newly developed disposable injection pen for the treatment of growth hormone deficiency in treatment-naïve children and adults
Abstract
Previous research has reported that ease of use of and preference for a delivery device are associated with greater patient compliance - an important factor in achieving optimal therapeutic results. The objective of this study was to assess the ease-of-use of a new disposable pen (GoQuick(®), Pfizer, Inc.) versus the current reusable pen (GENOTROPIN Pen(®), Pfizer, Inc.) to inject a daily dose of recombinant DNA origin human growth hormone, Genotropin(®) (somatropin) in standard practice. In this randomized, crossover, multicenter, multinational, open-label study, ease-of-use of and preference for the two pens were assessed in three treatment-naïve populations: 1) parents of very young children; 2) parent-child dyads; and 3) adults via use of a validated self-report Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) after 2 months of at-home-use experience. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who reported the new disposable pen to be no different from or easier to use than the current reusable pen. Safety was also assessed and reported according to local legal requirements. Of the 120 screened patients, 119 were included in the ease-of-use analysis and all were included in the safety analyses. In all, 67.2% found the new somatropin disposable pen to be no different from or easier to use than the reusable pen (95% confidence interval: 58.8-75.7). Most adverse events were mild or moderate. No deaths or device- or treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. These results suggest that improvements made to the reusable somatropin pen are tangible and recognizable to treatment-naïve patients and their caregivers, child-caregiver dyads, and adults, and may positively impact continued compliance with therapy.
Registry information: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01112865.
Keywords: Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire; disposable injection pen; ease-of-use; preference; recombinant human growth hormone; somatropin.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Ease of Use, Preference, and Safety of the Recombinant Human Growth Hormone Disposable Pen Compared with the Reusable Device: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Switch-Over, Prospective, Phase IV Trial.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Dec 20;13:2195-2205. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S229536. eCollection 2019. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019. PMID: 31908426 Free PMC article.
-
Ease of use and preference for a new disposable self-injection pen compared with a reusable pen for administering recombinant human growth hormone: A multicenter, 2-month, single-arm, open-label clinical trial in patient-caregiver dyads.Clin Ther. 2010 Nov;32(12):2036-47. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.11.007. Clin Ther. 2010. PMID: 21118739 Clinical Trial.
-
Psychometric assessment of the Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ): measuring ease of use and preference with injection pens for human growth hormone.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Oct 9;10:126. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-126. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012. PMID: 23046797 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Overview of insulin delivery pen devices.J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Sep-Oct;49(5):e118-31. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08125. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009. PMID: 19692314 Review.
-
Comparison of injection dose force, accuracy and precision among three growth hormone injection devices.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 May;10(3):321-7. doi: 10.1586/erd.13.12. Epub 2013 Apr 8. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013. PMID: 23560872 Review.
Cited by
-
Ease of Use, Preference, and Safety of the Recombinant Human Growth Hormone Disposable Pen Compared with the Reusable Device: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Switch-Over, Prospective, Phase IV Trial.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Dec 20;13:2195-2205. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S229536. eCollection 2019. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019. PMID: 31908426 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions Designed to Improve Adherence to Growth Hormone Treatment for Pediatric Patients and Their Families: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceutics. 2022 Nov 4;14(11):2373. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112373. Pharmaceutics. 2022. PMID: 36365191 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Genotropin prescribing information. New York, NY: Pfizer Inc; 2011. [Accessed on June 2, 2013]. Available at: http://www.genotropin.com/misc/prescribing-information.aspx.
-
- Finkelstein BS, Imperiale TF, Speroff T, Marrero U, Radcliffe DJ, Cuttler L. Effect of growth hormone therapy on height in children with idiopathic short stature: a meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:230–240. - PubMed
-
- Hey-Hadavi J, Pleil A, Deeb LC, et al. Ease of use and preference for a new disposable self-injection pen compared with a reusable pen for administering recombinant human growth hormone: A multicenter, 2-month, single-arm, open-label clinical trial in patient-caregiver dyads. Clin Ther. 2010;32:2036–2047. - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical