Introducing research initiatives into healthcare: what do doctors think?
- PMID: 24749875
- PMCID: PMC3995354
- DOI: 10.1089/bio.2013.0069
Introducing research initiatives into healthcare: what do doctors think?
Abstract
Background: Current national and international policies emphasize the need to develop research initiatives within our health care system. Institutional biobanking represents a modern, large-scale research initiative that is reliant upon the support of several aspects of the health care organization. This research project aims to explore doctors' views on the concept of institutional biobanking and to gain insight into the factors which impact the development of research initiatives within healthcare systems.
Methods: Qualitative research study using semi-structured interviews. The research was conducted across two public teaching hospitals in Sydney, Australia where institutional biobanking was being introduced. Twenty-five participants were interviewed, of whom 21 were medical practitioners at the specialist trainee level or above in a specialty directly related to biobanking; four were key stakeholders responsible for the design and implementation of the biobanking initiative.
Results: All participants strongly supported the concept of institutional biobanking. Participants highlighted the discordance between the doctors who work to establish the biobank (the contributors) and the researchers who use it (the consumers). Participants identified several barriers that limit the success of research initiatives in the hospital setting including: the 'resistance to change' culture; the difficulties in engaging health professionals in research initiatives; and the lack of incentives offered to doctors for their contribution. Doctors positively valued the opportunity to advise the implementation team, and felt that the initiative could benefit from their knowledge and expertise.
Conclusion: Successful integration of research initiatives into hospitals requires early collaboration between the implementing team and the health care professionals to produce a plan that is sensitive to the needs of the health professionals and tailored to the hospital setting. Research initiatives must consider incentives that encourage doctors to adopt operational responsibility for hospital research initiatives.
Similar articles
-
Health professionals' opinions on supporting a cancer biobank: identification of barriers to combat biobanking pitfalls.Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 May;24(5):626-32. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.191. Epub 2015 Sep 2. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016. PMID: 26328505 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019. Qatar Med J. 2019. PMID: 31763205 Free PMC article.
-
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122. Med J Aust. 2021. PMID: 34218436
-
Mini-Review of Laboratory Operations in Biobanking: Building Biobanking Resources for Translational Research.Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 28;8:362. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00362. eCollection 2020. Front Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32850593 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A review of big data and medical research.SAGE Open Med. 2020 Jun 25;8:2050312120934839. doi: 10.1177/2050312120934839. eCollection 2020. SAGE Open Med. 2020. PMID: 32637104 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Health professionals' opinions on supporting a cancer biobank: identification of barriers to combat biobanking pitfalls.Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 May;24(5):626-32. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.191. Epub 2015 Sep 2. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016. PMID: 26328505 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Conceptualising contexts, mechanisms and outcomes for implementing large-scale, multisite hospital improvement initiatives: a realist synthesis.BMJ Open. 2022 May 19;12(5):e058158. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058158. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35589340 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Biobanking Knowledge and Attitudes towards Biospecimen Donation among Healthcare Providers in Saudi Arabia.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;19(19):11872. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911872. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36231176 Free PMC article.
-
To donate or not to donate? Future healthcare professionals' opinions on biobanking of human biological material for research purposes.BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jul 22;24(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00930-z. BMC Med Ethics. 2023. PMID: 37481540 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Department of Health. Best Research for Best Health, A New National Health Research Strategy. The Stationary Office Ltd; 2006January Available from: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/systems/uploads/attachment_data/file/13657... Accessed 20September2013
-
- World Health Organization Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and Development: Financing and Coordination. 65th World Health Assembly, provisional agenda item 13.14, A65/24 29; 2012Apr. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/CEWG/pdf/A65_24-ne.pdf Accessed 20September2013
-
- National Institute for Health Research Annual Report 2011/12. HMSO; 2013Apr. Available from: www.nihr.ac.uk/publications Accessed 20September2013
-
- Department of Health. Innovation Health and Wealth: Accelerating Adoption and Diffusion in the NHS. HMSO; 2011December Available from: http://www.midtech.org.uk/wp_content/uploads/2010/05/InnovationHealthand... Accessed 20September2013
-
- McKeon S. Department of Health and Ageing, Australia. Strategic Review of Health and Medical Research: Better Health through Research. 2013April Available from http://www.mckeonreview.org.au Accessed 20September2013
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources