Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Mar;79(3):379-94.
doi: 10.1111/bcp.12406.

The development and assessment of biological treatments for children

Affiliations
Review

The development and assessment of biological treatments for children

Eve M D Smith et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

The development of biological agents with specific immunological targets has revolutionized the treatment of a wide variety of paediatric diseases where traditional immunosuppressive agents have been partly ineffective or intolerable. The increasing requirement for pharmaceutical companies to undertake paediatric studies has provided impetus for studies of biologics in children. The assessment of biological agents in children to date has largely relied upon randomized controlled trials using a withdrawal design, rather than a parallel study design. This approach has been largely used due to ethical concerns, including use of placebo treatments in children with active chronic disease, and justified on the basis that treatments have usually already undergone robust assessment in related adult conditions. However, this study design limits the reliability of the data and can confuse the interpretation of safety results. Careful ongoing monitoring of safety and efficacy in real-world practice through national and international biologics registries and robust reporting systems is crucial. The most commonly used biological agents in children target tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1, interleukin-6 and cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated antigen-4. These agents are most frequently used in paediatric rheumatic diseases. This review discusses the development and assessment of biologics within paediatric rheumatology with reference to the lessons learned from use in other subspecialties.

Keywords: adverse drug reactions; biologics; clinical trials; paediatric rheumatology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram outlining the withdrawal study design frequently used in clinical trials of biologics in children

References

    1. Horneff G. Update on biologicals for treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13:361–376. - PubMed
    1. Munro JE, Murray KJ. Advances in paediatric rheumatology: beyond NSAIDs and joint replacement. J Paed Child Health. 2004;40:161–169. - PubMed
    1. Brennan FM, Feldmann R. Cytokines in autoimmunity. Curr Opin Autoimmune. 1992;4:1520–1530. - PubMed
    1. Taylor PC. Pharmacology of TNF blocade in rheumatoid arthrtis and other chronic inflammatory disease. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2010;10:308–315. - PubMed
    1. Kok MR, Tak PP. Taking advances from bench to bedside during the last decade. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26:225–236. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances