Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;8(3):472-84.
doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0361-7. Epub 2014 Apr 22.

Psychosocial interventions to support partners of men with prostate cancer: a systematic and critical review of the literature

Affiliations

Psychosocial interventions to support partners of men with prostate cancer: a systematic and critical review of the literature

A C Wootten et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Prostate cancer poses many challenges for both the man and his partner. Partners have reported a range of issues that impact their own mental health following their partner's diagnosis of prostate cancer. The aim of this review is to summarise and critically evaluate the current literature reporting psychosocial intervention studies for partners of prostate cancer patients.

Methods: An extensive literature search of electronic databases was conducted (OvidMEDLINE 1946, 26th September 2013, and psychINFO 1967, 26th September 2013) using the keywords prostate cancer AND intervention* OR therapy* OR psychosocial intervention* OR support* AND couple* or Spouse* or Partner* or Intimate partner* matched to the title as well as secondary scanning of reference lists. Studies were included if they described interventions for partners of prostate cancer patients, either solely for the partners or as a couple, intended to alleviate distress and enhance the partner's or couple's quality of life, and reported a measurable outcome for partners.

Results: A total of 11 prostate cancer-specific intervention studies that included partners and reported separate results for the partners were found. Only one of these interventions was partner specific, the other eight involved the patient-partner dyad. The studies identified primarily focussed on two areas: emotional distress and sexual intimacy, and mixed findings were reported for efficacy of interventions.

Conclusions: Despite strong evidence that partners of men with prostate cancer experience difficulties associated with the impact of prostate cancer, there is limited research that has investigated the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for partners. Of the reviewed studies, it is evident that interventions targeting the reduction of emotional distress, improved communication and sexual intimacy between the couple and utilisation of strategies that enable partners to express their distress, learn new strategies and implement behavioural change show the most promising results in enhancing partner well-being.

Implications for cancer survivors: Significant progress is required in developing and evaluating appropriate and effective psychosocial support interventions for partners of prostate cancer survivors as partners appear to have significant unmet needs in this area.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cancer. 2005 Dec 15;104(12):2689-700 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Invest. 2006 Mar;24(2):192-8 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 1998 Jun;51(6):991-7 - PubMed
    1. Health Psychol. 2002 May;21(3):288-93 - PubMed
    1. Urol Nurs. 2007 Feb;27(1):65-77; discussion 78-80 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources