Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2014 Jun;14(2):187-90.
doi: 10.1007/s13191-013-0277-3. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

Implant retained auricular prosthesis with a modified hader bar: a case report

Affiliations
Case Reports

Implant retained auricular prosthesis with a modified hader bar: a case report

M Lovely et al. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Auricular prostheses for defects of external ear are retained either by mechanical means or implants. All implant retained prostheses are retained by various means such as bar and clip, magnetic attachments or a combination of bar, clip and magnets. The commonest problem encountered with the bar and clip system is loosening of the clip after 3-4 months. When magnets are used as retaining component they tend to corrode over a period of time. So various alternative retention methods which possess good retentive qualities, ease of reparability and patient friendly were tried. In the present case a newly modified Hader bar design which can act as an additional retentive feature apart from the clip is employed to increase retention. The major advantages in the modified Hader bar system were that only two implants were employed, the additional loops in the Hader bar prevented micro movements and the retentive acrylic locks were easy to repair if broken. The modified Hader bar has anti-rotational slots which prevents the sliding or rotation of the prosthesis which gave new confidence to the patient who was otherwise worried of inadvertent displacement of the ear prosthesis while playing.

Keywords: Auricular prostheses; Craniofacial implants; Modified Hader bar design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scan showing osseointegrated implants
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Modified Hader-bar system with two loops
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Super structure tried on patient
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Completed wax pattern
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Finished prosthesis

References

    1. Beumer III J, Marunick MT, Esposito SJ (eds) Maxillofacial rehabilitation: prosthodontic and surgical management of cancer-related, acquired, and congenital defects of the head and neck, 3rd edn. Quintessence Pub., p 276
    1. Chung RWC, Siu ASC, Chu FLS, Chow TW. Magnet retained auricular prosthesis with an implant supported composite bar: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:446–449. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00124-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Sousa AA, Mattos BSC. Magnetic retention and bar-clip attachment for implant-retained auricular prostheses: a comparative analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21:233–236. - PubMed
    1. Payne AG, Solomons YF. Mandibular implant supported over denture—a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems. Int J prosthodont. 2000;13:246–253. - PubMed
    1. Srithavaj T, Wijitworawong A, Kharel A, Sanohkann S, Santawisuk W. Attachment use in designing a stable facial prosthesis: a new clinical and technical report. Mahidol Dent J. 2006;26:337–343.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources