Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 Jul;40(7):973-80.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3287-7. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

Dysglycaemia in the critically ill and the interaction of chronic and acute glycaemia with mortality

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Dysglycaemia in the critically ill and the interaction of chronic and acute glycaemia with mortality

Mark P Plummer et al. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Hyperglycaemia is common in the critically ill. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of critical illness-associated hyperglycaemia (CIAH) and recognised and unrecognised diabetes in the critically ill as well as to evaluate the impact of premorbid glycaemia on the association between acute hyperglycaemia and mortality.

Methods: In 1,000 consecutively admitted patients we prospectively measured glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) on admission, and blood glucose concentrations during the 48 h after admission, to the intensive care unit. Patients with blood glucose ≥7.0 mmol/l when fasting or ≥11.1 mmol/l during feeding were deemed hyperglycaemic. Patients with acute hyperglycaemia and HbA1c <6.5% (48 mmol/mol) were categorised as 'CIAH', those with known diabetes as 'recognised diabetes', and those with HbA1c ≥6.5% but no previous diagnosis of diabetes as 'unrecognised diabetes'. The remainder were classified as 'normoglycaemic'. Hospital mortality, HbA1c and acute peak glycaemia were assessed using a logistic regression model.

Results: Of 1,000 patients, 498 (49.8%) had CIAH, 220 (22%) had recognised diabetes, 55 (5.5%) had unrecognised diabetes and 227 (22.7%) were normoglycaemic. The risk of death increased by approximately 20% for each increase in acute glycaemia of 1 mmol/l in patients with CIAH and those with diabetes and HbA1c levels <7% (53 mmol/mol), but not in patients with diabetes and HbA1c ≥7%. This association was lost when adjusted for severity of illness.

Conclusions: Critical illness-associated hyperglycaemia is the most frequent cause of hyperglycaemia in the critically ill. Peak glucose concentrations during critical illness are associated with increased mortality in patients with adequate premorbid glycaemic control, but not in patients with premorbid hyperglycaemia. Optimal glucose thresholds in the critically ill may, therefore, be affected by premorbid glycaemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):539-45 - PubMed
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Feb;38(2):192-209 - PubMed
    1. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2013 Mar;16(2):209-16 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care. 2013 Mar 01;17(2):R37 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2000 Mar 4;355(9206):773-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources