Medical expertise and patient involvement: a multiperspective qualitative observation study of the patient's role in oncological decision making
- PMID: 24760711
- PMCID: PMC4041665
- DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0268
Medical expertise and patient involvement: a multiperspective qualitative observation study of the patient's role in oncological decision making
Abstract
Background: Decision making in oncology poses intricate ethical questions because treatment decisions should account not only for evidence-based standards but also for the patient's individual values and preferences. However, there is a scarcity of empirical knowledge about patient involvement in oncological decision making.
Methods: Direct, nonparticipant observation was used as a qualitative research method to gain an understanding of the interplay between medical expertise and patient participation in oncological decision making. Based on a multiperspective approach, observations were performed in three settings (tumor conference, ward round, and outpatient clinic) in the oncology department of a German university hospital. The observation transcripts were analyzed using central features of qualitative data analysis.
Results: Major differences were identified regarding the decision-making processes in the three settings related to the patient's presence or absence. When the patient was absent, his or her wishes were cited only irregularly; however, patients actively advanced their wishes when present. Preselection of treatments by physicians was observed, narrowing the scope of options that were finally discussed with the patient. Dealing with decisions about risky treatments was especially regarded as part of the physician's professional expertise.
Conclusion: The study reveals aspects of decision making for cancer patients that have been underexposed in the empirical and theoretical literature so far. Among these are the relevance of structural aspects for the decisions made and the practice of preselection of treatment options. It should be further discussed how far medical expertise reaches and whether therapeutic decisions can be made without consulting the patient.
Keywords: Decision making; Observation; Patient participation; Qualitative research.
©AlphaMed Press.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.
Similar articles
-
Physician perspectives and compliance with patient advance directives: the role external factors play on physician decision making.BMC Med Ethics. 2012 Nov 21;13:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-31. BMC Med Ethics. 2012. PMID: 23171364 Free PMC article.
-
Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making.Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):466-70. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160415.08497.11. Med Care. 2005. PMID: 15838411
-
"Well, I think there is great variation...": a qualitative study of oncologists' experiences and views regarding medical criteria and other factors relevant to treatment decisions in advanced cancer.Oncologist. 2013;18(1):90-6. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0206. Epub 2013 Jan 3. Oncologist. 2013. PMID: 23287883 Free PMC article.
-
Physician, patient, and contextual factors affecting treatment decisions in older adults with cancer and models of decision making: a literature review.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012 Jan;39(1):E70-83. doi: 10.1188/12.ONF.E70-E83. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012. PMID: 22201670 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shared decision making among individuals with cancer in non-Western cultures: a literature review.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Sep;40(5):454-63. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.454-463. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013. PMID: 23989019 Review.
Cited by
-
Patients' experiences of the decision-making process for clinical trial participation.Nurs Health Sci. 2022 Mar;24(1):65-72. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12933. Epub 2022 Mar 21. Nurs Health Sci. 2022. PMID: 35212102 Free PMC article.
-
What Affects Treatment Underuse in Multiple Myeloma in the United States: A Qualitative Study.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 19;15(8):2369. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082369. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37190297 Free PMC article.
-
Involvement in treatment decision-making and self-reported efficacy among patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a nationwide multi-center cross-sectional study.Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 26;13:1168078. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1168078. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37564928 Free PMC article.
-
Elicitation of preferences in the second half of the shared decision making process needs attention; a qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05476-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32646422 Free PMC article.
-
Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumour conferences in breast cancer care (PINTU): a mixed-methods study protocol.BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 8;9(4):e024621. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024621. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30962228 Free PMC article.
References
-
- van Leeuwen AF, Voogt E, Visser A, et al. Considerations of healthcare professionals in medical decision-making about treatment for clinical end-stage cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;28:351–355. - PubMed
-
- Winkler EC, Hiddemann W, Marckmann G. Ethical assessment of life-prolonging treatment. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:720–722. - PubMed
-
- Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision making: A narrative review. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:102–114. - PubMed
-
- Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–692. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical