Reproducibility issues in science, is P value really the only answer?
- PMID: 24760820
- PMCID: PMC4024892
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1323051111
Reproducibility issues in science, is P value really the only answer?
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
Reply to Gelman, Gaudart, Pericchi: More reasons to revise standards for statistical evidence.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 13;111(19):E1936-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400338111. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. PMID: 24940581 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Revised standards for statistical evidence.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 26;110(48):19313-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313476110. Epub 2013 Nov 11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013. PMID: 24218581 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Big names in statistics want to shake up much-maligned P value.Nature. 2017 Jul 26;548(7665):16-17. doi: 10.1038/nature.2017.22375. Nature. 2017. PMID: 28770857 No abstract available.
-
Statistics Commentary Series: Commentary No. 17-Validity.J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016 Dec;36(6):542-544. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000589. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016. PMID: 27684292 No abstract available.
-
[Statistics at the time of the crisis].Epidemiol Prev. 2017 May-Aug;41(3-4):165-169. doi: 10.19191/EP17.3-4.P165.048. Epidemiol Prev. 2017. PMID: 28929711 Italian.
-
Experimental toxicology: Issues of statistics, experimental design, and replication.Neurotoxicology. 2017 Jan;58:137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Dec 10. Neurotoxicology. 2017. PMID: 27965035 Review.
-
Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (4).Eur J Pain. 2002;6(1):89-93. doi: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0306. Eur J Pain. 2002. PMID: 11888232 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Reply to Gelman, Gaudart, Pericchi: More reasons to revise standards for statistical evidence.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 13;111(19):E1936-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400338111. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. PMID: 24940581 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research.PeerJ. 2017 Jul 7;5:e3544. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3544. eCollection 2017. PeerJ. 2017. PMID: 28698825 Free PMC article.
-
Ten Important Considerations for Ovarian Cancer Screening.Diagnostics (Basel). 2017 Apr 13;7(2):22. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics7020022. Diagnostics (Basel). 2017. PMID: 28406427 Free PMC article. Review.
-
P-Mart: Interactive Analysis of Ion Abundance Global Proteomics Data.J Proteome Res. 2019 Mar 1;18(3):1426-1432. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00840. Epub 2019 Feb 6. J Proteome Res. 2019. PMID: 30667224 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Korn EL, et al. Clinical trial designs for cytostatic agents: Are new approaches needed? J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(1):265–272. - PubMed
-
- Horton R. Common sense and figures: The rhetoric of validity in medicine (Bradford Hill Memorial Lecture 1999) Stat Med. 2000;19(23):3149–3164. - PubMed
-
- Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF. Improving the reporting of randomised trials: The CONSORT Statement and beyond. Stat Med. 2012;31(25):2985–2997. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical