Reproducibility issues in science, is P value really the only answer?
- PMID: 24760820
- PMCID: PMC4024892
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1323051111
Reproducibility issues in science, is P value really the only answer?
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
Reply to Gelman, Gaudart, Pericchi: More reasons to revise standards for statistical evidence.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 13;111(19):E1936-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400338111. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. PMID: 24940581 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Revised standards for statistical evidence.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 26;110(48):19313-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313476110. Epub 2013 Nov 11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013. PMID: 24218581 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Korn EL, et al. Clinical trial designs for cytostatic agents: Are new approaches needed? J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(1):265–272. - PubMed
-
- Horton R. Common sense and figures: The rhetoric of validity in medicine (Bradford Hill Memorial Lecture 1999) Stat Med. 2000;19(23):3149–3164. - PubMed
-
- Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF. Improving the reporting of randomised trials: The CONSORT Statement and beyond. Stat Med. 2012;31(25):2985–2997. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
