Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Apr;29(2):65-73.
doi: 10.4103/0972-3919.130274.

FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response

Affiliations
Review

FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response

Bal Sanghera et al. Indian J Nucl Med. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Review published studies to investigate the value of clinical 3-deoxy-3-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting response to treatment.

Materials and methods: Interrogate databases to identify suitable publications between 2007 and 2013 with a minimum of five patients. Articles within the inclusion criteria were reviewed with major findings reported leading to a descriptive analysis of FLT PET in therapy response.

Results: Lesions investigated included glioma, head and neck, esophageal, lung, breast, gastric, renal, rectal, sarcomas, germ cell, lymphomas, leukemia, and melanoma resulting in a total of 34 studies analyzed. A variety of therapies were applied and dissimilar PET protocols were widespread making direct comparison between studies challenging. Though baseline, early and late therapy scans were popular particularly in chemotherapy regimes. Most studies investigated showed significantly reduced FLT uptake during or after therapy compared with pretreatment scans.

Conclusion: Current evidence suggests FLT PET has a positive role to play in predicting therapy response especially in brain, lung, and breast cancers where good correlation with Ki-67 is observed. However, careful attention must be placed in undertaking larger clinical trials where harmonization of scanning and analysis protocols are strictly adhered to fully assess the true potential of FLT PET in predicting response to treatment.

Keywords: 18F-fluorothymidine; positron emission tomography; predict; response; review; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Breast FLT PET-CT SUVmax reduction >39% pretreatment (lower row) compared with 10 days after start of the first cycle of chemotherapy (upper row). Drawn circles indicate lesion position on respective PET slices containing SUVmax. FLT = 3-Deoxy-3-18F-fluorothymidine, PET = positron emission tomography, CT = computed tomography, SUV = standardized uptake value, max = maximum

References

    1. Ben-Haim S, Ell P. 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the evaluation of cancer treatment response. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:188–99. - PubMed
    1. Weber WA. Assessing tumor response to therapy. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1S–10S. - PubMed
    1. Lopci E, Fanti S. Molecular imaging in oncology. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2013;187:371–400. - PubMed
    1. Chalkidou A, Landau DB, Odell EW, Cornelius VR, O'Doherty MJ, Marsden PK. Correlation between Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and 18F-Fluorothymidine uptake in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:3499–513. - PubMed
    1. Krohn KA, Mankoff DA, Eary JF. Imaging cellular proliferation as a measure of response to therapy. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001:96S–103S. - PubMed