Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;29(4):174-178.
doi: 10.1089/gyn.2012.0113.

Current Role of Robotic Hysterectomy

Affiliations

Current Role of Robotic Hysterectomy

Brent Dubeshter et al. J Gynecol Surg. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Background: While robotic surgery for gynecologic indications received U.S. government approval in 2005, and has been rapidly and widely adopted, it is currently unclear how often this approach to hysterectomy is utilized. Objective: The aim of this research was to assess length of stay (LOS), mortality, indications, and current use of robotic hysterectomy, compared to other types of hysterectomy. Methods: A retrospective study of hysterectomies performed in New York State (NYS) in 2011 was performed. Data, including indication for surgery, age, procedure, LOS, and discharge status were obtained from the NYS Department of Health Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS). Outcome Measures: LOS and mortality rate, were calculated according to institution, procedure, and indication for surgery. Results: For 22073 hysterectomies performed in NYS, the mean LOS was 2.9 days, and there were 29 (0.13%) deaths. The mean LOS for abdominal (12774 cases, 3.9 days) hysterectomies was longer than for laparoscopic (3927 cases, 1.6 days), robotic (2814 cases, 1.6 days), or vaginal (2558 cases, 1.7 days) hysterectomies (p<0.05). The adjusted mortality rates for abdominal (0.20%), laparoscopic (0.03%), robotic (0.07%), and vaginal (0.04%) hysterectomies were not significantly different. Overall, robotic surgery was performed in 29% of hospitals, by 11% of physicians and in 13% of cases. A robotic approach was utilized in 35% of patients with uterine cancer, 13% with endometriosis, 11% with excessive bleeding, 8% with leiomyomata, and 8% with pelvic relaxation. Conclusions: Despite the advantages in reduced LOS for robotic and other minimally invasive types of hysterectomies, the abdominal route is still predominant in most institutions. (J GYNECOL SURG XX:1).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Intuitive Surgical. Company Backgrounder. 2012. www.intuitivesurgical.com/company/media/media_kit/871072-K_Company_Backg.... [Oct 9;2012 ]. www.intuitivesurgical.com/company/media/media_kit/871072-K_Company_Backg...
    1. Visco AG. Advincula A. Robotic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:1369. - PubMed
    1. Gobern JM. Novak CM. Lockrow EG. Survey of robotic surgery training in obstetrics and gynecology residency. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:755. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Women's Reproductive Health: Hysterectomy Fact Sheet. http://cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/WomensRH/00-04-FS_Hysterectomy.htm. [Mar 12;2013 ]. http://cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/WomensRH/00-04-FS_Hysterectomy.htm
    1. New York State Department of Health. SPARCS Operations Guide. www.health.ny.gov/statistics/sparcs/sysdoc/operguid.htm#intro. [Aug 8;2012 ]. www.health.ny.gov/statistics/sparcs/sysdoc/operguid.htm#intro

LinkOut - more resources