Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;8(2):138-44.
doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.2.138. Epub 2014 Apr 8.

Spinous process osteotomy to facilitate the access to the spinal canal when decompressing the spinal canal in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

Affiliations

Spinous process osteotomy to facilitate the access to the spinal canal when decompressing the spinal canal in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

Erland Hermansen et al. Asian Spine J. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective study.

Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to investigate the union-rate of the spinous process after performing a spinous process osteotomy and whether union affects the clinical results after surgery.

Overview of literature: In the present study, spinous process osteotomy was used to facilitate access to the spinal canal when performing a decompressive procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the union rate of the spinous process and its effect on the clinical results of the procedure.

Methods: All patients were included in the study that underwent a decompressive procedure through spinous process osteotomy be between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007. Operation protocols were reviewed. A computed tomography (CT) scan was performed to evaluate the union of the osteotomies of the spinous process. According to the CT-scans, patients were divided into three groups: "complete-union," "partial-union," and "non-union." Patients reported their clinical results through a self-administered questionnaire.

Results: The mean period of follow up was 21.6 months (range, 16-28 months). A total of 44% of the performed osteotomies were considered as united. Ten patients (18%) were classified as "complete-union," 30 patients (55%) as "partial-union," and 15 patients (27%) as "non-union." The "complete-union" group showed better clinical results and scored significantly better in the Oswestry Disability Index and EQ-5D. However, no statistical difference was found in the pain-scores. There were no differences between the "partial-union" group and the "no-union" group.

Conclusions: We found a radiologic union for 60 out of 135 (44%) spinous process osteotomies.

Keywords: Osteotomy; Spinal stenosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of patient inclusion to the study, using spinous process osteotomy to facilitate acces to the spinal canal when decompressing the spinal canal in patients suffering from lumbar spinal stenosis. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) The spinous process ratio (osteotomi-basis coefficient) is calculated from the posterior part of spinous process divided on the basis and the anterior part of the remaining spinous process (a/b). This computed tomography (CT)-scan picture show a spinous process that is not united. (B) This picture show a CT-scan with a united spinous process. The arrow indicates were the osteotomy were performed.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Self-reported effect of surgery. 0, total improvement; 1, much improvement; 2, some improvement; 3, no improvement; 4, some worse; 5, much worse; 6, worse than ever.

References

    1. Ciol MA, Deyo RA, Howell E, Kreif S. An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:285–290. - PubMed
    1. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:1424–1435. - PubMed
    1. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:936–943. - PubMed
    1. Malmivaara A, Slatis P, Heliovaara M, et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:1–8. - PubMed
    1. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:794–810. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources