Clinicopathologic features of epithelial ovarian carcinoma in younger vs. older patients: analysis in Japanese women
- PMID: 24761215
- PMCID: PMC3996261
- DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2014.25.2.118
Clinicopathologic features of epithelial ovarian carcinoma in younger vs. older patients: analysis in Japanese women
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical features of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) in younger vs. older patients in Japan.
Methods: We collected data on 1,562 patients with EOC treated at multiple institutions in the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group, and analyzed them retrospectively. All patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (≤40 years old) and group B (>40 years old). The data were analyzed to evaluate prognostic factors and the distribution of features in each group. Patients were subjected to univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate overall survival (OS).
Results: The median follow-up time was 45.1 months (range, 1 to 257 months). Patients in group A had a significantly higher rate of stage I disease (67.3% vs. 42.6%, respectively; p<0.001) and the mucinous type (36.7% vs. 13.5%, respectively; p<0.001) than those in group B. There was a significant difference of OS between the 2 groups (p=0.013). However, upon stratification according to the stage, there were no significant differences in the OS between the 2 groups (group A vs. B: stage I, p=0.533; stage II-IV, p=0.407). Multivariate analysis revealed that younger age was not an independent prognostic factor for OS.
Conclusion: On the basis of our data, younger patients had a different clinical profile than older patients, particularly regarding the stage of the disease and pathological distribution; however, they showed a similar long-term prognosis, even upon stratification according to the stage.
Keywords: Epithelial ovarian cancer; Histological type; Overall survival; Reproductive age; Stage.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Impact of age on clinicopathological features and survival of epithelial ovarian neoplasms in reproductive age.Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):187-194. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01550-7. Epub 2019 Sep 20. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31541363
-
Epithelial ovarian tumors in the reproductive age group: age is not an independent prognostic factor.Cancer. 1996 Mar 15;77(6):1131-6. Cancer. 1996. PMID: 8635134
-
[Analysis of factors related to the prognostic benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 25;56(6):385-392. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20201207-00871. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021. PMID: 34154313 Chinese.
-
Is standard radical surgery necessary for elderly patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma? ~Propensity score matched analysis~.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 7;50(4):411-418. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz194. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31837651
-
Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy on moderate- and high-risk stage I and II epithelian ovarian cancer patients. Long-term single institution experience and literature review.Clin Transl Oncol. 2011 Feb;13(2):121-32. doi: 10.1007/s12094-011-0629-6. Clin Transl Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21324801 Review.
Cited by
-
Characterization of Primary Mucinous Ovarian Cancer by Diffusion-Weighted and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement MRI in Comparison with Serous Ovarian Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;15(5):1453. doi: 10.3390/cancers15051453. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36900244 Free PMC article.
-
Age is associated with prognosis in serous ovarian carcinoma.J Ovarian Res. 2017 Jun 12;10(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13048-017-0331-6. J Ovarian Res. 2017. PMID: 28606125 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicopathological and Oncological Outcomes of Borderline Mucinous Tumours of Ovary: a Large Case Series.Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;15(1):88-94. doi: 10.1007/s13193-023-01849-y. Epub 2023 Nov 24. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38511015 Free PMC article.
-
Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma: Integrating Molecular Stratification into Surgical and Therapeutic Management.Biomedicines. 2025 May 14;13(5):1198. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13051198. Biomedicines. 2025. PMID: 40427025 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of positive ZEB1 expression in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma as an oncologic outcome-predicting indicator.Oncol Lett. 2017 Oct;14(4):4287-4293. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6658. Epub 2017 Jul 24. Oncol Lett. 2017. PMID: 28943941 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Ovarian treatment guidelines 2010. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2010.
-
- Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51:15–36. - PubMed
-
- Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, Ghafoor A, Samuels A, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:8–29. - PubMed
-
- Lindemann K, Christensen RD, Vergote I, Stuart G, Izquierdo MA, Kaern J, et al. First-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without epirubicin (TEC versus TC): a gynecologic cancer intergroup study of the NSGO, EORTC GCG and NCIC CTG. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2613–2619. - PubMed
-
- Katsumata N, Yasuda M, Isonishi S, Takahashi F, Michimae H, Kimura E, et al. Long-term results of dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin versus conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin for treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (JGOG 3016): a randomised, controlled, open-label trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1020–1026. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources