Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jul 10:6:5.
doi: 10.1186/2052-3211-6-5. eCollection 2013.

National medicines policies - a review of the evolution and development processes

Affiliations
Review

National medicines policies - a review of the evolution and development processes

Joëlle M Hoebert et al. J Pharm Policy Pract. .

Abstract

Objectives: Continuous provision of appropriate medicines of assured quality, in adequate quantities, and at reasonable prices is a concern for all national governments. A national medicines policy (NMP) developed in a collaborative fashion identifies strategies needed to meet these objectives and provides a comprehensive framework to develop all components of a national pharmaceutical sector. To meet the health needs of the population, there is a general need for medicine policies based on universal principles, but nevertheless adapted to the national situation. This review aims to provide a quantitative and qualitative (describing the historical development) study of the development process and evolution of NMPs.

Methods: The number of NMPs and their current status has been obtained from the results of the assessment of WHO Level I indicators. The policy formulation process is examined in more detail with case studies from four countries: Sri Lanka, Australia, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and South Africa.

Results: The number of NMPs worldwide has increased in the last 25 years with the highest proportional increase in the last 5-10 years in high-income countries. Higher income countries seem to have more NMP implementation plans available and have updated their NMP more recently. The four case studies show that the development of a NMP is a complex process that is country specific. In addition, it demonstrates that an appropriate political window is needed for the policy to be passed (for South Africa and the FYR Macedonia, a major political event acted as a trigger for initiating the policy development). Policy-making does not stop with the official adoption of a policy but should create mechanisms for implementation and monitoring. The NMPs of the FYR Macedonia and Australia provide indicators for monitoring.

Conclusions: To date, not all countries have a NMP since political pressure by national experts or non-governmental organizations is generally needed to establish a NMP. Case studies in four countries showed that the policy process is just as important as the policy document since the process must create a mechanism by which all stakeholders are brought together and a sense of collective ownership of the final policy may be achieved.

Keywords: Development; Medicines; National medicines policy; Opportunities; Policy process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trends in the formulation of national medicines policies (NMP), by countries’ level of income, 1999, 2003, 2007 and 2011. Source: WHO level 1 survey (as appeared in the World Medicines Situation Report 2004), and the global overview of pharmaceutical sector country profiles (2011). Percentages are based on number of countries surveyed by WHO.

References

    1. Kanji N, Hardon A, Harnmeijer JW, Mamdani M, Walt G. Drugs Policy in Developing Countries. London: Zed Books; 1992. p. 136.
    1. Another Development in Pharmaceuticals. Development Dialogue, Volume 2. Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjold Foundation; 1985. http://www.dhf.uu.se/publications/development-dialogue/another-developme...
    1. Frisher M, Martino O, Crome I, Croft P. Trends in drug misuse recorded in primary care in the UK from 1998 to 2005. J Public Health (Oxf) 2009;6(1):69–73. - PubMed
    1. WHO. Equitable access to essential medicines: a framework for collective action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2004/WHO_EDM_2004.4.pdf.
    1. Cameron A, Ewen M, Ross-Degnan D, Ball D, Laing R. Medicine prices, availability, and affordability in 36 developing and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis. Lancet. 2009;6(9659):240–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61762-6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources