National medicines policies - a review of the evolution and development processes
- PMID: 24764540
- PMCID: PMC3987068
- DOI: 10.1186/2052-3211-6-5
National medicines policies - a review of the evolution and development processes
Abstract
Objectives: Continuous provision of appropriate medicines of assured quality, in adequate quantities, and at reasonable prices is a concern for all national governments. A national medicines policy (NMP) developed in a collaborative fashion identifies strategies needed to meet these objectives and provides a comprehensive framework to develop all components of a national pharmaceutical sector. To meet the health needs of the population, there is a general need for medicine policies based on universal principles, but nevertheless adapted to the national situation. This review aims to provide a quantitative and qualitative (describing the historical development) study of the development process and evolution of NMPs.
Methods: The number of NMPs and their current status has been obtained from the results of the assessment of WHO Level I indicators. The policy formulation process is examined in more detail with case studies from four countries: Sri Lanka, Australia, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and South Africa.
Results: The number of NMPs worldwide has increased in the last 25 years with the highest proportional increase in the last 5-10 years in high-income countries. Higher income countries seem to have more NMP implementation plans available and have updated their NMP more recently. The four case studies show that the development of a NMP is a complex process that is country specific. In addition, it demonstrates that an appropriate political window is needed for the policy to be passed (for South Africa and the FYR Macedonia, a major political event acted as a trigger for initiating the policy development). Policy-making does not stop with the official adoption of a policy but should create mechanisms for implementation and monitoring. The NMPs of the FYR Macedonia and Australia provide indicators for monitoring.
Conclusions: To date, not all countries have a NMP since political pressure by national experts or non-governmental organizations is generally needed to establish a NMP. Case studies in four countries showed that the policy process is just as important as the policy document since the process must create a mechanism by which all stakeholders are brought together and a sense of collective ownership of the final policy may be achieved.
Keywords: Development; Medicines; National medicines policy; Opportunities; Policy process.
Figures

References
-
- Kanji N, Hardon A, Harnmeijer JW, Mamdani M, Walt G. Drugs Policy in Developing Countries. London: Zed Books; 1992. p. 136.
-
- Another Development in Pharmaceuticals. Development Dialogue, Volume 2. Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjold Foundation; 1985. http://www.dhf.uu.se/publications/development-dialogue/another-developme...
-
- Frisher M, Martino O, Crome I, Croft P. Trends in drug misuse recorded in primary care in the UK from 1998 to 2005. J Public Health (Oxf) 2009;6(1):69–73. - PubMed
-
- WHO. Equitable access to essential medicines: a framework for collective action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2004/WHO_EDM_2004.4.pdf.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources