Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 May;48(10):848-55.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093510.

Confounding factors and genetic polymorphism in the evaluation of individual steroid profiling

Tiia Kuuranne  1 , Martial Saugy, Norbert Baume
Affiliations
Review

Confounding factors and genetic polymorphism in the evaluation of individual steroid profiling

Tiia Kuuranne et al. Br J Sports Med. 2014 May.

Abstract

In the fight against doping, steroid profiling is a powerful tool to detect drug misuse with endogenous anabolic androgenic steroids. To establish sensitive and reliable models, the factors influencing profiling should be recognised. We performed an extensive literature review of the multiple factors that could influence the quantitative levels and ratios of endogenous steroids in urine matrix. For a comprehensive and scientific evaluation of the urinary steroid profile, it is necessary to define the target analytes as well as testosterone metabolism. The two main confounding factors, that is, endogenous and exogenous factors, are detailed to show the complex process of quantifying the steroid profile within WADA-accredited laboratories. Technical aspects are also discussed as they could have a significant impact on the steroid profile, and thus the steroid module of the athlete biological passport (ABP). The different factors impacting the major components of the steroid profile must be understood to ensure scientifically sound interpretation through the Bayesian model of the ABP. Not only should the statistical data be considered but also the experts in the field must be consulted for successful implementation of the steroidal module.

Keywords: Doping; Steroids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Target analytes of the steroid profile, their interindependence and metabolic pathway. 5α-/5β-diol, 5α/5β-androstane-3α,17β-diol; DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone; DHT, dihydrotestosterone.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of steroid profile generated by the Bayesian model of the ABP for the T/E ratio parameter. The blue line represents the measured T/E values, whereas the individual limits are shown by the red lines. ABP, athlete biological passport; E, epitestosterone; T, testosterone.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic representation of the variables influencing the steroid profile in the fight against doping. ABP, athlete biological passport; GC-C-IRMS, gas chromatography and combustion coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry; ITP, initial testing procedure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic illustrations of (A) glucuronidation and (B) sulfoconjugation of testosterone. SULT, sulfotransferase enzymes; UGT, uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Shackleton CH. Profiling steroid hormones and urinary steroids. J Chromatogr 1986;379:91–156 - PubMed
    1. Radford PF. Recent developments in drug abuse and doping control in sport. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1990;35:S2–6 - PubMed
    1. Donike M. The detection of doping by means of chromatographic methods. 1966. Drug Test Anal 2011;3:15–7 - PubMed
    1. Thevis M, Kuuranne T, Geyer H, et al. Annual banned-substance review: analytical approaches in human sports drug testing. Drug Test Anal 2013;5:1–19 - PubMed
    1. Bowers LD. Analytical advances in detection of performance-enhancing compounds. Clin Chem 1997;43:1299–304 - PubMed

MeSH terms