Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;29(5):518-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

Frontal plane compensatory strategies associated with self-selected walking speed in individuals post-stroke

Affiliations

Frontal plane compensatory strategies associated with self-selected walking speed in individuals post-stroke

Victoria A Stanhope et al. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2014 May.

Abstract

Background: Approximately two out of three individuals post-stroke experience walking impairments. Frontal plane compensatory strategies (i.e. pelvic hiking and circumduction) are observed in post-stroke gait in part to achieve foot clearance in response to reduced knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between self-selected walking speed and the kinematic patterns related to paretic foot clearance during post-stroke walking.

Methods: Gait analysis was performed at self-selected walking speed for 21 individuals post-stroke. Four kinematic variables were calculated during the swing phase of the paretic limb: peak pelvic tilt (pelvic hiking), peak hip abduction (circumduction), peak knee flexion, and peak ankle dorsiflexion. Paretic joint angles were analyzed across self-selected walking speed as well as between functionally relevant ambulation categories (Household <0.4m/s, Limited Community 0.4-0.8m/s, Community >0.8m/s).

Findings: While all subjects exhibited similar foot clearance, slower walkers exhibited greater peak pelvic hiking and less knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, and circumduction compared to faster walkers (P<.05). Additionally, four of the fastest walkers compensated for poor knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion through large amounts of circumduction.

Interpretation: These findings suggest that improved gait performance after stroke, as measured by self-selected walking speed, is not necessarily always accomplished through gait patterns that more closely resemble healthy gait for all variables. It appears the ability to walk fast is achieved by either sufficient ankle dorsiflexion and knee flexion to achieve foot clearance or the employment of circumduction to overcome a deficit in either ankle dorsiflexion or knee flexion.

Keywords: Circumduction; Gait; Kinematics; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average peak joint angles during swing phase of the paretic limb across all self-selected walking speeds for (a) ankle dorsiflexion, (b) knee flexion, (c) pelvic tilt, and (d) hip abduction. Vertical lines at 0.4 and 0.8 m/s represent speed divisions between ambulation categories determined by Perry et al.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bohannon R, Horton M, Wikholm J. Importance of four variables of walking to patients with stroke. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 1991;14(3):246–250. - PubMed
    1. Chen G, et al. Gait deviations associated with post-stroke hemiparesis: improvement during treadmill walking using weight support, speed, support stiffness, and handrail hold. Gait and Posture. 2005a;22(1):57–62. - PubMed
    1. Chen G, et al. Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait and Posture. 2005b;22(1):51–56. - PubMed
    1. Jørgensen HS, et al. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: The copenhagen stroke study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1995;76(1):27–32. - PubMed
    1. Kerrigan DC, et al. Hip hiking and circumduction: quantitative definitions. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2000;79(3):247–252. - PubMed

Publication types