The role of red and processed meat in colorectal cancer development: a perspective
- PMID: 24769880
- DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.02.011
The role of red and processed meat in colorectal cancer development: a perspective
Abstract
This paper is based on a workshop held in Oslo, Norway in November 2013, in which experts discussed how to reach consensus on the healthiness of red and processed meat. Recent nutritional recommendations include reducing intake of red and processed meat to reduce cancer risk, in particular colorectal cancer (CRC). Epidemiological and mechanistic data on associations between red and processed meat intake and CRC are inconsistent and underlying mechanisms are unclear. There is a need for further studies on differences between white and red meat, between processed and whole red meat and between different types of processed meats, as potential health risks may not be the same for all products. Better biomarkers of meat intake and of cancer occurrence and updated food composition databases are required for future studies. Modifying meat composition via animal feeding and breeding, improving meat processing by alternative methods such as adding phytochemicals and improving our diets in general are strategies that need to be followed up.
Keywords: Animal models; Colorectal cancer; Epidemiology; Phytochemicals; Processed meat; Red meat.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Meat intake, cooking methods, dietary carcinogens, and colorectal cancer risk: findings from the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry.Cancer Med. 2015 Jun;4(6):936-52. doi: 10.1002/cam4.461. Epub 2015 Apr 7. Cancer Med. 2015. PMID: 25846122 Free PMC article.
-
Associations of red and processed meat intake with major molecular pathological features of colorectal cancer.Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 May;32(5):409-418. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0275-6. Epub 2017 Jun 23. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28646407
-
Letter to the editors: Balancing the risks and benefits of unprocessed and processed red meat consumption for both consumers and the environment.Meat Sci. 2010 Oct;86(2):529-30; author reply 531. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 Apr 29. Meat Sci. 2010. PMID: 20494525 No abstract available.
-
Carcinogenicity of consumption of red meat and processed meat: A review of scientific news since the IARC decision.Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 Jul;105:256-261. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.04.028. Epub 2017 Apr 24. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017. PMID: 28450127 Review.
-
Mechanisms Linking Colorectal Cancer to the Consumption of (Processed) Red Meat: A Review.Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016 Dec 9;56(16):2747-66. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2013.873886. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016. PMID: 25975275 Review.
Cited by
-
Flavor and Metabolite Profiles of Meat, Meat Substitutes, and Traditional Plant-Based High-Protein Food Products Available in Australia.Foods. 2021 Apr 8;10(4):801. doi: 10.3390/foods10040801. Foods. 2021. PMID: 33917948 Free PMC article.
-
Emerging Evidence on the Effects of Dietary Factors on the Gut Microbiome in Colorectal Cancer.Front Nutr. 2021 Oct 11;8:718389. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.718389. eCollection 2021. Front Nutr. 2021. PMID: 34708063 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diet, Microbes, and Cancer Across the Tree of Life: a Systematic Review.Curr Nutr Rep. 2022 Sep;11(3):508-525. doi: 10.1007/s13668-022-00420-5. Epub 2022 Jun 15. Curr Nutr Rep. 2022. PMID: 35704266 Free PMC article.
-
Health effects associated with consumption of processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages and trans fatty acids: a Burden of Proof study.Nat Med. 2025 Jul;31(7):2244-2254. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03775-8. Epub 2025 Jun 30. Nat Med. 2025. PMID: 40588677
-
A population-specific correlation between ADIPOQ rs2241766 and rs 1501299 and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis for debate.Int J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr;22(2):307-315. doi: 10.1007/s10147-016-1044-3. Epub 2016 Oct 4. Int J Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 27704292
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical