Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;32(6):577-582.
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2909. Epub 2014 Apr 25.

Fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to FokI nuclease improves the specificity of genome modification

Affiliations

Fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to FokI nuclease improves the specificity of genome modification

John P Guilinger et al. Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Genome editing by Cas9, which cleaves double-stranded DNA at a sequence programmed by a short single-guide RNA (sgRNA), can result in off-target DNA modification that may be detrimental in some applications. To improve DNA cleavage specificity, we generated fusions of catalytically inactive Cas9 and FokI nuclease (fCas9). DNA cleavage by fCas9 requires association of two fCas9 monomers that simultaneously bind target sites ∼15 or 25 base pairs apart. In human cells, fCas9 modified target DNA sites with >140-fold higher specificity than wild-type Cas9 and with an efficiency similar to that of paired Cas9 'nickases', recently engineered variants that cleave only one DNA strand per monomer. The specificity of fCas9 was at least fourfold higher than that of paired nickases at loci with highly similar off-target sites. Target sites that conform to the substrate requirements of fCas9 occur on average every 34 bp in the human genome, suggesting the versatility of this approach for highly specific genome-wide editing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Architectures of Cas9 and FokI-dCas9 fusion variants
(a) Two monomers of FokI nuclease (red) fused to dCas9 (yellow) bind in complex with guide RNAs (sgRNA, green) to separate sites within the target locus. Only adjacently bound FokI-dCas9 monomers can assemble a catalytically active FokI nuclease dimer, triggering dsDNA cleavage. (b) FokI-dCas9 fusion architectures tested. Four distinct configurations of NLS, FokI nuclease, and dCas9 were assembled. 17 protein linker variants were also tested (see main text). (c) sgRNA orientation and (d) target sites tested within the EmGFP gene. Seven sgRNA target sites were chosen to test FokI-dCas9 activity in an orientation in which the PAM is distal from the cleaved spacer sequence (orientation A). Together, these seven sgRNAs enabled testing of FokI-dCas9 fusion variants across seven spacer lengths ranging from 5 to 43 bp. See Supplementary Figure 1 for guide RNAs used to test orientation B, in which the PAM is adjacent to the spacer sequence.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Genomic DNA modification by fCas9, Cas9 nickase, and wild-type Cas9
Detection of genomic modification by loss of GFP signal or Surveyor assay at either an integrated GFP gene, or at endogenous genomic targets within the AAVS1, CLTA, EMX, HBB, or VEGF genes (Supplementary Figure 5) (a) GFP disruption activity of fCas9, Cas9 nickase, or wild-type Cas9 with either no sgRNA, or sgRNA pairs of variable spacer length targeting the GFP gene in orientation A. (b) Indel modification efficiency from PAGE analysis of a Surveyor cleavage assay of renatured target-site DNA amplified from cells treated with fCas9, Cas9 nickase, or wild-type Cas9 and two sgRNAs spaced 14 bp apart targeting the GFP site (sgRNAs G3 and G7; Figure 1d), each sgRNA individually, or no sgRNAs. The indel modification percentage is shown below each lane for samples with modification above the detection limit (~2%). (c-h) Indel modification efficiency for (c) two pairs of sgRNAs spaced 14 or 25 bp apart targeting the GFP site, (d) on pair of sgRNAs spaced 16 bp apart targeting the AAVS1 site, (e) one pair of sgRNAs spaced 19 bp apart targeting the CLTA site, (f) one pair of sgRNAs spaced 23 bp apart targeting the EMX site (g) one pair of sgRNAs spaced 16 bp apart targeting the HBB site, and (h) two pairs of sgRNAs spaced 14 or 16 bp apart targeting the VEGF site. Error bars reflect standard error of the mean from three biological replicates performed on different days.
Figure 3
Figure 3. DNA modification specificity of fCas9, Cas9 nickase, and wild-type Cas9
(a) Results from high-throughput sequencing of GFP on-target sites amplified from 150 ng genomic DNA isolated from human cells treated with a plasmid expressing wild-type Cas9, Cas9 nickase, or fCas9; and either a plasmid expressing a single sgRNA (G1, G3, G5, or G7), or two plasmids each expressing a different sgRNA (G1+G5 or G3+G7). As a negative control, transfection and sequencing were performed in triplicate as above without any sgRNA expression plasmids. Sequences with more than one insertion or deletion at the GFP target site (the start of the G1 binding site to the end of the G7 binding site) were considered indels. Indel percentages are the number of indels observed divided by the total number of sequences. While wild-type Cas9 produced indels across all sgRNA treatments, fCas9 and Cas9 nickase produced indels efficiently (> 1%) only when paired sgRNAs were present. Indels induced by fCas9 and single sgRNAs were not detected at a frequency above that of the no-gRNA control, whereas Cas9 nickase and single sgRNAs modified the target GFP sequence at an average rate of 0.12%. (b-e) The indel mutation frequency from high-throughput DNA sequencing of amplified genomic on-target sites and off-target sites from human cells treated with fCas9, Cas9 nickase, or wild-type Cas9 and (b) two sgRNAs spaced 19 bp apart targeting the CLTA site (sgRNAs C1 and C2), (c) two sgRNAs spaced 23 bp apart targeting the EMX site (sgRNAs E1 and E2), or (d, e) two sgRNAs spaced 14 bp apart targeting the VEGF site (sgRNAs V1 and V2). (e) Two in-depth trials to measure genome modification at VEGF off-target site 1. Trial 1 used 150 ng of genomic input DNA and > 8 × 105 sequence reads for each sample; trial 2 used 600 ng of genomic input DNA and > 23 × 105 sequence reads for each sample. In (b-e), all significant (P value < 0.005 Fisher’s Exact Test) indel frequencies are shown. P values are listed in Supplementary Table 3. For (b-e) each on- and off-target sample was sequenced once with > 10,000 sequences analyzed per on-target sample and an average of 76,260 sequences analyzed per off-target sample (Supplementary Table 3).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Genomic DNA modification specificity of fCas9 and Cas9 nickase at genomic sites with highly similar off-target sites
(a-c) The indel mutation frequency from high-throughput DNA sequencing of amplified genomic on-target sites and off-target sites (Supplementary Table 4) from human cells treated with fCas9 or Cas9 nickase and (a) two sgRNAs (sgRNAs SA1 and SA2) spaced 15 bp apart targeting site A, human genomic locus chr1:21,655,401-21,655,461; (b) two sgRNAs (sgRNAs SB1 and SB2) spaced 24 bp apart targeting site B, human genomic locus chr2:31,485,447-31,485,516; or (c) two sgRNAs (sgRNAs SC1 and SC2) spaced 23 bp apart targeting the site C, human genomic locus chr3:48,747,484-48,747,552. P values are listed in Supplementary Table 5. Each on- and off-target sample was sequenced once with > 10,000 sequences analyzed per on-target sample and an average of 83,000 sequences analyzed per off-target sample (Supplementary Table 5). The mock transfection control represents the limit of detection for each site, determined from cells transfected with a GFP expression plasmid and no sgRNA or nuclease expression constructs.

Comment in

  • More specific CRISPR editing.
    de Souza N. de Souza N. Nat Methods. 2014 Jul;11(7):712. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3020. Nat Methods. 2014. PMID: 25110782 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shalem O, et al. Genome-Scale CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout Screening in Human Cells. Science. 2013;343:84–87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perez EE, et al. Establishment of HIV-1 resistance in CD4+ T cells by genome editing using zinc-finger nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008;26:808–816. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mali P, et al. RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013;339:823–826. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fu Y, Sander JD, Reyon D, Cascio VM, Joung JK. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014 doi:10.1038/nbt.2808. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jinek M, et al. A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity. Science. 2012;337:816–821. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data