Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Jan-Mar;26(1):28-35.
doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20140005.

[Reaction time of a health care team to monitoring alarms in the intensive care unit: implications for the safety of seriously ill patients]

[Article in Portuguese]
Adriana Carla Bridi  1 , Roberto Carlos Lyra da Silva  1 , Carolina Correa Pinto de Farias  1 , Andrezza Serpa Franco  1 , Viviane de Lima Quintas dos Santos  1
Affiliations
Observational Study

[Reaction time of a health care team to monitoring alarms in the intensive care unit: implications for the safety of seriously ill patients]

[Article in Portuguese]
Adriana Carla Bridi et al. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To define the characteristics and measure the reaction time of a health care team monitoring alarms in the intensive care unit.

Methods: A quantitative, observational, and descriptive study developed at the coronary care unit of a cardiology public hospital in Rio de Janeiro state (RJ). Data were obtained from the information collected on the patients, the monitoring used, and the measurement of the team's reaction time to the alarms of multi-parameter monitors during a non-participatory field observation.

Results: Eighty-eight patients were followed (49 during the day shift and 39 during the night shift). During the 40 hours of observation (20 hours during the day shift and 20 hours during the night shift), the total number of monitoring alarms was 227, with 106 alarms during the day shift and 121 during the night shift, an average of 5.7 alarms/hour. In total, 145 alarms unanswered by the team were observed, with 68 occurring during the day shift (64.15%) and 77 during the night shift (63.64%). This study demonstrated that the reaction time was longer than 10 minutes in more than 60% of the alarms, which were considered as unanswered alarms. The median reaction time of the answered alarms was 4 minutes and 54 seconds during the day shift and 4 minutes and 55 seconds during the night shift. The respiration monitoring was activated in only nine patients (23.07%) during the night shift. Regarding the alarm quality of these variables, the arrhythmia alarm was qualified in only 10 (20.40%) of the day-shift patients and the respiration alarm in four night-shift patients (44.44%).

Conclusion: The programming and configuration of the physiological variables monitored and the parameters of alarms in the intensive care unit were inadequate; there was a delay and lack of response to the alarms, suggesting that relevant alarms may have been ignored by the health care team, thus compromising the patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Response to the monitoring alarm according to the professional team. Values are expressed as percentages. The values refer to 82 alarms with a response, with 38 (35.85%) during the day shift and 44 (36.37%) during the night shift.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Procedures performed by the nursing team in response to the monitoring alarm. Values are expressed as percentages. The values refer to 82 alarms with a response, with 38 (35.85%) during the day shift and 44 (36.37%) during the night shift. * One alarm generated two procedures.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Siebig S, Kuhls S, Imhoff M, Langgartner J, Reng M, Schölmerich J, et al. Collection of annotated data in a critical validation study for alarm algorithms in intensive care-a methodologic framework. J Crit Care. 2010;25(1):128–135. - PubMed
    1. Siebig S, Kuhls S, Imhoff M, Gather U, Schölmerich J, Wrede CE. Intensive care unit alarms-how many do we need? Crit Care Med. 2010;38(2):451–456. - PubMed
    1. Blum JM, Tremper KK. Alarms in the intensive care unit: too much of a good thing is dangerous: is it time to add some intelligence to alarms? Crit Care Med. 2010;38(2):702–703. - PubMed
    1. Graham KC, Cvach M. Monitor alarm fatigue: standardizing use of physiological monitors and decreasing nuisance alarms. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19(1):28–34. quiz 35. - PubMed
    1. Korniewicz DM, Clark T, David Y. A national online survey on the effectiveness of clinical alarms. Am J Crit Care. 2008;17(1):36–41. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms