Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan-Mar;26(1):65-70.
doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20140010.

[Impact of hospitalization in an intensive care unit on range of motion of critically ill patients: a pilot study]

[Article in Portuguese]
Affiliations

[Impact of hospitalization in an intensive care unit on range of motion of critically ill patients: a pilot study]

[Article in Portuguese]
Balbino Rivail Ventura Nepomuceno Jr et al. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the joint range of motion of critically ill patients during hospitalization in the intensive care unit.

Methods: This work was a prospective longitudinal study conducted in a critical care unit of a public hospital in the city of Salvador (BA) from September to November 2010. The main variable evaluated was the passive joint range of motion. A goniometer was used to measure the elbows, knees and ankles at the time of admission and at discharge. All patients admitted in the period were included other than patients with length of stay <72 hours and patients with reduced joint range of motion on admission.

Results: The sample consisted of 22 subjects with a mean age of 53.5±17.6 years, duration of stay in the intensive care unit of 13.0±6.0 days and time on mechanical ventilation of 12.0±6.3 days. The APACHE II score was 28.5±7.3, and the majority of patients had functional independence at admission with a prior Barthel index of 88.8±19. The losses of joint range of motion were 11.1±2.1°, 11.0±2.2°, 8.4±1.7°, 9.2±1.6°, 5.8±0.9° and 5.1±1.0°, for the right and left elbows, knees and ankles, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusion: There was a tendency towards decreased range of motion of large joints such as the ankle, knee and elbow during hospitalization in the intensive care unit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of patients included in the study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yarkony GM. Prevention and management of contractures. In: Kapan PE, editor. The practice of physical medicine. Springfield, (IL): Thomas Books; 1984. pp. 526–537.
    1. Clavet H, Hébert PC, Fergusson D, Doucette S, Trudel G. Joint contracture following prolonged stay in the intensive care unit. CMAJ. 2008;178(6):691–697. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martinez BP, Bispo AO, Duarte AC, Gomes Neto M. Declínio funcional em uma unidade de terapia intensiva. Rev Inspirar Mov Saúde. 2013;5(1):1–5.
    1. França EE, Ferrari F, Fernandes P, Cavalcanti R, Duarte A, Martinez BP, et al. Fisioterapia em pacientes críticos adultos: recomendações do Departamento de Fisioterapia da Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2012;24(1):6–22. - PubMed
    1. Trudel G, Uhthoff HK. Contractures secondary to immobility: is the restriction articular or muscular? An experimental longitudinal study in rat knees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(1):6–13. - PubMed

Publication types