Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;472(9):2766-73.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3642-6. Epub 2014 Apr 26.

Confirmation of long-term in vivo bearing mobility in eight rotating-platform TKAs

Affiliations

Confirmation of long-term in vivo bearing mobility in eight rotating-platform TKAs

Michael T LaCour et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Posterior-stabilized rotating-platform prostheses for TKAs were designed to improve contact mechanics at the femoral-polyethylene (PE) interface. Short-term followup studies have shown that the PE bearings rotate with respect to the tibia but might not necessarily track with the femur. It is important to know how kinematics in these designs change owing to long-term in vivo use.

Questions/purposes: We asked whether there is a significant change in the in vivo kinematic performance of a posterior-stabilized rotating-platform prosthesis at as much as 10 years postoperative. We specifically examined (1) relative femoral component-PE bearing and relative PE bearing-tibial tray motion; (2) relative AP motion of the femoral condyles with respect to the tibial tray; and (3) relative femorotibial condylar translations.

Methods: In vivo three-dimensional kinematics were evaluated for eight patients at 3 months, 15 months, 5 years, and 10 years after TKA with primary implantation of a posterior-stabilized rotating-platform prosthesis. Each patient performed deep knee bend activity, and three-dimensional kinematics were reconstructed from multiple fluoroscopic images using a three-dimensional to two-dimensional registration technique. Once complete, relative component axial rotation patterns, medial and lateral condyle motions throughout flexion, and the presence of femoral condylar lift-off were analyzed.

Results: Overall, tibial bearing rotation was maintained at 10 years postoperatively. There was no statistical difference between postoperative periods for any kinematic parameter except for femoral component-PE bearing axial rotation, which was reduced at the 10-year evaluation versus other assessment periods (p = 0.0006). The lack of statistical difference between postoperative evaluation periods indicates sustained overall implant kinematic performance.

Conclusions: Our study showed that PE bearing-tibial tray mobility was maintained and that femoral component-PE bearing rotation was reduced at the 10-year followup. This suggests that the overall kinematic performance of this mobile-bearing implant is not negatively affected 10 years postoperatively.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The mean (± SD) of the variations in axial rotation patterns of the polyethylene (PE) bearing with respect to the tibial tray as a function of flexion angle are plotted for eight patients at the four followup times. External rotation of the PE bearing with respect to the tibia is presented as positive.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Individual patient axial rotation data from full extension to maximum knee flexion are shown for the 10 year followup. External rotation of the superior component with respect to the inferior component is positive.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The mean (± SD) of the variations in axial rotation patterns of the femoral component with respect to the polyethylene (PE) bearing as a function of flexion angle are plotted for eight patients at the four followup times. External rotation of the femoral component with respect to the PE bearing is positive.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The mean (± SD) of the variations in the average femoral lateral condylar motion with respect to the tibial tray as a function of flexion angle are plotted for eight patients at the four followup times.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The mean (± SD) of the variations in the average femoral medial condylar motion with respect to the tibial tray as a function of flexion angle are plotted for eight patients at the four followup times.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Argenson JA, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Scott WN, Kelly MA, Aubaniac JM. In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech. 2005;38:277–284. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banks S, Bellemans J, Nozaki H, Whiteside LA, Harman M, Hodge WA. Knee motion during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:131–138. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000063121.39522.19. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. The New Jersey Low-Contact-Stress Knee Replacement System: biomechanical rationale and review of the first 123 cemented cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1986;105:197–204. doi: 10.1007/BF00435480. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:114–130. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000062385.79828.72. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Haas BD, Stiehl JB. Multicenter determination of in vivo knee kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:37–57. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000092986.12414.b5. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms