Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008;8(1):AlboVol8No1.

The Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings (TOMUS): Design and Methodology

Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)

The Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings (TOMUS): Design and Methodology

Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN). J Appl Res. 2008.

Abstract

Objective: Mid-urethral slings (MUS) are increasingly common surgical procedures for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. There are currently no adequately powered trials with sufficient length of follow-up comparing the efficacy or safety of the transobturator and retropubic MUS. As a result, no selection criteria are available to guide surgeons or patients. This article describes the methodology and rationale for the Trial Of Mid-Urethral Slings (TOMUS).

Patients and methods: The primary aims of this randomized controlled trial is to compare subjective and objective success rates for urinary incontinence (UI) at 12 and 24 months following retropubic and transobturator MUS procedures. Secondary aims are to compare the resolution of overall and stress-specific UI, morbidity, the time to adequate voiding, satisfaction, and quality of life in the two groups. TOMUS will also assess the clinical utility of pre-operative urodynamics in women undergoing MUS procedures. The primary outcome will be obtained at 12 months and 24 months. The definition of treatment success is two-fold. Objective treatment success is defined by a negative stress test, a negative 24-hour pad test and no retreatment for SUI. Subjective treatment success is defined by no self-reported leakage on 3-day diary and no self-reported SUI symptoms. Enrollment began April 2006 and is expected to be complete in 2 years.

Conclusions: The TOMUS trial is designed to provide outcome and safety information to pelvic surgeons and their patients on the two most commonly performed MUS techniques.

Keywords: Midurethral slings; Randomized surgical trial; Tension free vaginal sling; Transobturator; Urinary incontinence; Urodynamics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study Design
Patient flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lose G, Ostergard DR. Medical technology assessment and surgery for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10:351–352. - PubMed
    1. Nilsson CG. Introduction of a new surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:877–880. - PubMed
    1. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7:81–85. discussion 5-6. - PubMed
    1. Delorme E. Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women [in French] Prog Urol. 2001;11:1306–1313. - PubMed
    1. David-Montefiore E, Frobert JL, Grisard-Anaf M, Lienhart J, Bonnet K, Poncelet C, et al. Peri-operative complications and pain after the suburethral sling procedure for urinary stress incontinence: a French prospective randomised multicentre study comparing the retropubic and transobturator routes. Eur Urol. 2006;49:133–138. - PubMed