Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014:2014:364941.
doi: 10.1155/2014/364941. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

A patient-centered electronic tool for weight loss outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Affiliations

A patient-centered electronic tool for weight loss outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

G Craig Wood et al. J Obes. 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Current patient education and informed consent regarding weight loss expectations for bariatric surgery candidates are largely based on averages from large patient cohorts. The variation in weight loss outcomes illustrates the need for establishing more realistic weight loss goals for individual patients. This study was designed to develop a simple web-based tool which provides patient-specific weight loss expectations. METHODS. Postoperative weight measurements after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were collected and analyzed with patient characteristics known to influence weight loss outcomes. Quantile regression was used to create expected weight loss curves (25th, 50th, and 75th %tile) for the 24 months after RYGB. The resulting equations were validated and used to develop web-based tool for predicting weight loss outcomes. RESULTS. Weight loss data from 2986 patients (2608 in the primary cohort and 378 in the validation cohort) were included. Preoperative body mass index (BMI) and age were found to have a high correlation with weight loss accomplishment (P < 0.0001 for each). An electronic tool was created that provides easy access to patient-specific, 24-month weight loss trajectories based on initial BMI and age. CONCLUSIONS. This validated, patient-centered electronic tool will assist patients and providers in patient teaching, informed consent, and postoperative weight loss management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of initial BMI within various age intervals for patients that had RYGB (n = 2608).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plot of the percent of excess weight lost for all patients from 6 months before surgery to 30 months after surgery.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of estimated post-RYGB BMI between the primary cohort and the validation cohort using an age of 50 and an initial BMI of 50 kg/m2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Example of a patient tracking their weight after surgery using the Get~2~Goal electronic tool.

References

    1. Sturm R. Increases in clinically severe obesity in the United States, 1986–2000. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2003;163(18):2146–2148. - PubMed
    1. Livingston EH. The incidence of bariatric surgery has plateaued in the U.S. American Journal of Surgery. 2010;200(3):378–385. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Avidor Y, Still CD, Brunner M, Buchwald JN, Buchwald H. Primary care and subspecialty management of morbid obesity: referral patterns for bariatric surgery. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2007;3(3):392–407. - PubMed
    1. Galuska DA, Will JC, Serdula MK, Ford ES. Are health care professionals advising obese patients to lose weight? Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;282(16):1576–1578. - PubMed
    1. Balduf LM, Farrell TM. Attitudes, beliefs, and referral patterns of PCPs to bariatric surgeons. Journal of Surgical Research. 2008;144(1):49–58. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms