Diagnostic discrepancies in malignant astrocytoma due to limited small pathological tumor sample can be overcome by IDH1 testing
- PMID: 24777756
- PMCID: PMC4386582
- DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1451-0
Diagnostic discrepancies in malignant astrocytoma due to limited small pathological tumor sample can be overcome by IDH1 testing
Abstract
The accurate grading of malignant astrocytomas has significant prognostic and therapeutic implications. Traditional histopathological grading can be challenging due to regional tumor heterogeneity, especially in scenarios where small amounts of tissue are available for pathologic review. Here, we hypothesized that a critical tumor resection volume is needed for correct grading of astrocytomas by histopathology. For insufficient tissue sampling, IDH1 molecular testing can act as a complementary marker to improve diagnostic accuracy. Volumetric analyses were obtained using preoperative and postoperative MRI images. Histological specimens were gathered from 403 patients with malignant astrocytoma who underwent craniotomy. IDH1 status was assessed by immunohistochemistry and sequencing. Patients with >20 cubic centimeters (cc) of the total tumor volume resected on MRI have higher rate of GBM diagnosis compared to <20 cc [odds ratio (OR) 2.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-4.06, P < 0.0001]. The rate of IDH1 status remained constant regardless of the tumor volume resected (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.48-1.36, P < 0.43). The rate of GBM diagnosis is twofold greater for individual surgical specimen >10 cc than those of lower volume (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.88-3.28, P < 0.0001). Overall survival for AA patients with >20 cc tumor resection on MRI is significantly better than those with <20 cc tumor resected (P < 0.05). No volume-dependent differences were observed in patients with GBM (P < 0.4), IDH1 wild type (P < 0.1) or IDH1 mutation (P < 0.88). IDH1 status should be considered when total resection volume is <20 cc based on MRI analysis and for surgical specimen <10 cc to complement histopathologic diagnosis of malignant astrocytomas. In these specimens, under-diagnosis of GBM may occur when analysis is restricted to histopathology alone.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Stupp R, Tonn J, Brada M, Pentheroudakis G. High-grade malignant glioma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology. 2010;21:190–193. - PubMed
-
- Gupta T, Sarin R. Poor-prognosis high-grade gliomas: evolving an evidence-based standard of care. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3:557–564. - PubMed
-
- Ryken T, Frankel B, Julien T, Olson JJ. Surgical management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults: role of cytoreductive surgery. J Neurooncol. 2008;89:271–286. - PubMed
-
- Tortosa A, Vinolas N, Villa S, Verger E, Gil JM, Brell M, Caral L, Pujol T, Acebes J, Ribalta T, Ferrer I, Graus F. Prognostic implication of clinical, radiologic and pathologic features in patients with anaplastic gliomas. Cancer. 2003;97:1063–1071. - PubMed
-
- Scott C, Nelson J, Farnan N, Curran W, Murray K, Fischbach A, Gaspar L, Nelson D. Central pathology review in clinical trials for patients with malignant glioma. A report of radiation therapy oncology group. Cancer. 1995;767:307–313. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
