Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;17(2):164-8.
doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.128061.

Comparative evaluation of immunohistochemistry, histopathology and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions

Affiliations

Comparative evaluation of immunohistochemistry, histopathology and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions

Prahlad A Saraf et al. J Conserv Dent. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Background and aim: Periapical lesions often present differently on the radiograph resulting in a dilemma in the mind of the dentist to arrive at a final diagnosis. Although, histopathologic diagnosis has been used for confirmation of the true nature of periapical lesion, the concept of transformation of periapical granulomas containing epithelium without cystification into cyst remains controversial. The aim of this in vivo study was to evaluate the efficacy of conventional radiography and histopathology in differentiating periapical lesions in adjunct with immunohistochemical analysis.

Aim: Periapical lesions often present differently on the radiograph resulting in a dilemma in the mind of the dentist to arrive at a final diagnosis. Although, histopathologic diagnosis has been used for confirmation of the true nature of periapical lesion, the concept of transformation of periapical granulomas containing epithelium without cystification into cyst remains controversial. The aim of this in vivo study was to evaluate the efficacy of conventional radiography and histopathology in differentiating periapical lesions in adjunct with immunohistochemical analysis.

Materials and method: Thirty patients having large periapical radiolucency that do not heal successfully with routine endodontic therapy in relation to either maxillary or mandibular anterior teeth were selected for the study. Intraoral periapical radiographs were obtained and provisional diagnosis of the apical areas were made. Endodontic surgery was performed to enable histopathogical investigation. The histopathological interpretation was done to arrive at a final diagnosis and selected questionable granulomas were subjected for cytokeratin (CK-14) stain.

Results: The histopathological profile of lesions consisted of 66.66% periapical granulomas, 10% cysts, 6.67% abscess and 16.67% granulomas with cystic potential. The radiographic and histopathologic correlation was found in only 30% of these cases. Strong CK-14 expression was observed in all five cases of periapical granuloma with cystic potential.

Conclusion: The radiographic diagnosis of periapical lesions remains inconclusive. Although histopathologic examination of periapical lesions gives true nature, the precise nature of subsets of periapical granulomas may be achieved with adjunct use of immunohistochemical markers.

Keywords: Conventional radiography; Cytokeratin-14; Periapical lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intraoral Periapical Radiographs showing (a) Periapical Abscess; (b) Periapical Granuloma; (c) Periapical Cyst
Figure 2
Figure 2
Photomicrographs showing histopathologic picture of (a) Periapical Abscess; (b) Periapical Granuloma; (c) Periapical Granuloma with cystic potential, the arrows indicating epithelial lining with suttle clefting; (d) Periapical Cyst, the arrows indicating the epithelial lining
Figure 3
Figure 3
Photomicrograph of CK-14 staining showing (a) Negative expression in Periapical Granuloma; (b) and (c) Strong positive expression in Periapical Granuloma with cystic potential and Periapical Cyst
Figure 4
Figure 4
Graph representing the co-relation between radiographic and histopathologic observations

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. Mosby: Elsevier; 2006. p. 543.
    1. Gundappa M, Ng SY, Whaites EJ. Comparison of ultrasound, digital and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:326–33. - PubMed
    1. Ramachandran Nair PN. Light and electron microscopic studies of root canal flora and periapical lesions. J Endod. 1987;13:29–39. - PubMed
    1. Block RM, Bushell A, Rodrigeus H, Langeland K. A histopathologic, histobacteriologic, and radiographic study of periapical endodontic surgical specimens. J Endod. 1976;12:656–78. - PubMed
    1. Langeland K, Block RM, Va R, Grossman LI. A histopathological and histobacteriologic study of 35 periapical endodontic surgical specimens. J Endod. 1977;3:8–23. - PubMed