Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014:2014:679605.
doi: 10.1155/2014/679605. Epub 2014 Mar 23.

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis risk and liver disease

Affiliations

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis risk and liver disease

Robert F Hanna et al. Int J Nephrol. 2014.

Abstract

Objective. Evaluate the incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients with liver disease in the peritransplant period. Materials and Methods. This IRB approved study retrospectively reviewed patients requiring transplantation for cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or both from 2003 to 2013. Records were reviewed identifying those having gadolinium enhanced MRI within 1 year of posttransplantation to document degree of liver disease, renal disease, and evidence for NSF. Results. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI was performed on 312 of 837 patients, including 23 with severe renal failure (GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 cm(2)) and 289 with GFR > 30. Two of 23 patients with renal failure developed NSF compared to zero NSF cases in 289 patients with GFR > 30 (0/289; P < 0.003). High dose gadodiamide was used in the two NSF cases. There was no increased incidence of NSF with severe liver disease (1/71) compared to nonsevere liver disease (1/241; P = 0.412). Conclusion. Renal disease is a risk factor for NSF, but in our small sample our evidence suggests liver disease is not an additional risk factor, especially if a low-risk gadolinium agent is used. Noting that not all patients received high-risk gadolinium, a larger study focusing on patients receiving high-risk gadolinium is needed to further evaluate NSF risk in liver disease in the peritransplant period.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of patient selection. Solid lines specify patients who were included in the study and dotted line specifies patients who were excluded.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42(5):1208–1236. - PubMed
    1. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1996;334(11):693–699. - PubMed
    1. Wong LL. Current status of liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer. The American Journal of Surgery. 2002;183(3):309–316. - PubMed
    1. United Network for Organ Sharing. Organ distribution: allocation of livers. Policy. 2010;(3.6) http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/policiesAndBylaws/policies.asp.
    1. Colli A, Fraquelli M, Casazza G, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography, spiral CT, magnetic resonance, and alpha-fetoprotein in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006;101(3):513–523. - PubMed