Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;3(2):85-91.
doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.122449.

Comparison of different caries diagnostic thresholds under epidemiological and clinical settings among 7-15 year old school children from Bangalore city

Swapnil Kumar Jain  1 , K Pushpanjali  2 , Satheesh Kumar Reddy  3 , Rahul Gaikwad  4 , Shravani Deolia  4
Affiliations

Comparison of different caries diagnostic thresholds under epidemiological and clinical settings among 7-15 year old school children from Bangalore city

Swapnil Kumar Jain et al. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the different caries diagnostic thresholds under epidemiological and clinical settings among 7-15 year old school children.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken among 7-15 years old school children of Bangalore city. Total 738 children were enrolled in the study. General information was collected regarding oral hygiene practice and personal habits of the schoolchildren. Subsequently, examination was done under both the settings to record Decayed, missing and filled surfaces index for permanent teeth (DMFS) and Decayed, missing and filled surfaces index for deciduous teeth (dmfs) using the World Health Organization (WHO) and WHO + IL criteria.

Results: The present study showed that both the settings (clinical and epidemiological) and diagnostic thresholds (WHO and WHO + IL), could influence the detection of carious lesions. Mean Ds under WHO + Initial lesions (IL) criteria (3.92 + 3.49) was nearly double of WHO criteria (1.88 + 2.73,) and the influence observed was more in 14 years of age, where mean Ds under WHO + IL criteria (5.43 + 2.5) which was more than double of WHO criteria (2.02 + 1.9).

Conclusion: The choice of a diagnostic threshold (WHO and WHO + IL) and the conditions of examination (epidemiological and clinical) are important for the detection of caries.

Keywords: Caries diagnostic thresholds; dental caries; initial carious lesion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oral Health Surveys – Basic Methods. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization Publications; 1997.
    1. Harris NO. Primary Preventive Dentistry. 6th ed. 2004. pp. 46–54.
    1. Ismail AI. Visual and Visuo-tactile Detection of Dental Caries. J Dent Res. 2004;83:C56–66. - PubMed
    1. School of Dentistry. Course: Operative Dentistry IV: Current concepts in Operative Dentistry: An evidence-based approach. 2001. Aug 28, Available from: http://www1.umn.edu/dental/courses/dent_6806fall03/paper2/incipientcarie... .
    1. Kassawara AB, Assaf AV, Meneghim Mde C, Pereira AC, Topping G, Levin K, et al. Comparison of epidemiological evaluations under different caries diagnostic thresholds. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2007;2:137–44. - PubMed