Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Oct;49(5):1498-518.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12178. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

Health care utilization and receipt of preventive care for patients seen at federally funded health centers compared to other sites of primary care

Neda Laiteerapong  1 , James Kirby, Yue Gao, Tzy-Chyi Yu, Ravi Sharma, Robert Nocon, Sang Mee Lee, Marshall H Chin, Aviva G Nathan, Quyen Ngo-Metzger, Elbert S Huang
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Health care utilization and receipt of preventive care for patients seen at federally funded health centers compared to other sites of primary care

Neda Laiteerapong et al. Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To compare utilization and preventive care receipt among patients of federal Section 330 health centers (HCs) versus patients of other settings.

Data sources: A nationally representative sample of adults from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2004-2008).

Study design: HC patients were defined as those with ≥50 percent of outpatient visits at HCs in the first panel year. Outcomes included utilization and preventive care receipt from the second panel year. We used negative binomial and logistic regression models with propensity score adjustment for confounding differences between HC and non-HC patients.

Principal findings: Compared to non-HC patients, HC patients had fewer office visits (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.63) and hospitalizations (aIRR, 0.43) (both p < .001). HC patients were more likely to receive breast cancer screening than non-HC patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.78, p < .01). In subgroup analyses, uninsured HC patients had fewer outpatient and emergency room visits and were more likely to receive dietary advice and breast cancer screening compared to non-HC patients.

Conclusions: Health centers add value to the health care system by providing socially and medically disadvantaged patients with care that results in lower utilization and maintained or improved preventive care.

Keywords: Safety net; preventive care; utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Addicott R. What Accountable Care Organizations Will Mean for Physicians. British Medical Journal. 2012;345:e6461. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP)” [accessed on May 7, 2013]. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/
    1. D’Agostino RB., Jr Propensity Score Methods for Bias Reduction in the Comparison of a Treatment to a Naon-Randomized Control Group. Statistics in Medicine. 1998;17(19):2265–81. - PubMed
    1. Dugoff EH, Schuler M. Stuart EA. Generalizing Observational Study Results: Applying Propensity Score Methods to Complex Surveys. Health Services Research. 2013;49:284–303. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Epstein AJ. The Role of Public Clinics in Preventable Hospitalizations among Vulnerable Populations. Health Services Research. 2001;36(2):405–20. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources