Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;113(4):343-52.
doi: 10.1038/hdy.2014.36. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

Accuracy of genomic selection models in a large population of open-pollinated families in white spruce

Affiliations

Accuracy of genomic selection models in a large population of open-pollinated families in white spruce

J Beaulieu et al. Heredity (Edinb). 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) is of interest in breeding because of its potential for predicting the genetic value of individuals and increasing genetic gains per unit of time. To date, very few studies have reported empirical results of GS potential in the context of large population sizes and long breeding cycles such as for boreal trees. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of marker-aided selection in an undomesticated white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) population of large effective size using a GS approach. A discovery population of 1694 trees representative of 214 open-pollinated families from 43 natural populations was phenotyped for 12 wood and growth traits and genotyped for 6385 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) mined in 2660 gene sequences. GS models were built to predict estimated breeding values using all the available SNPs or SNP subsets of the largest absolute effects, and they were validated using various cross-validation schemes. The accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) varied from 0.327 to 0.435 when the training and the validation data sets shared half-sibs that were on average 90% of the accuracies achieved through traditionally estimated breeding values. The trend was also the same for validation across sites. As expected, the accuracy of GEBVs obtained after cross-validation with individuals of unknown relatedness was lower with about half of the accuracy achieved when half-sibs were present. We showed that with the marker densities used in the current study, predictions with low to moderate accuracy could be obtained within a large undomesticated population of related individuals, potentially resulting in larger gains per unit of time with GS than with the traditional approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Beaulieu J, Deslauriers M, Daoust G. Flower induction treatments have no effects on seed traits and transmission of alleles in Picea glauca. Tree Physiol. 1998;18:817–821. - PubMed
    1. Beaulieu J, Doerksen T, Boyle B, Clément S, Deslauriers M, Beauseigle S, et al. Association genetics of wood physical traits in the conifer white spruce and relationships with gene expression. Genetics. 2011;188:197–214. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buckler ES, Holland JB, Bradbury PJ, Acharya CB, Brown PJ, Browne C. The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science. 2009;325:714–718. - PubMed
    1. Burdon RD, Wilcox PL.2011Integration of molecular markers in breedingIn: Plomion C, Bousquet J, Kole C (eds)Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Conifers CRC Press and Edenbridge Science Publishers: New York; 276–322.
    1. Croiseau P, Legarra A, Guillaume F, Fritz S, Baur A, Colombani C, et al. Fine tuning genomic evaluations in dairy cattle through SNP pre-selection with the Elastic-Net algorithm. Genet Res. 2011;93:409–417. - PubMed

Publication types