Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Jan;85(1):109-16.
doi: 10.2319/111013-823.1.

Hounsfield Units: a new indicator showing maxillary resistance in rapid maxillary expansion cases?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Hounsfield Units: a new indicator showing maxillary resistance in rapid maxillary expansion cases?

Yasemin Bahar Acar et al. Angle Orthod. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To determine if density measurements of several maxillary regions in Hounsfield Units (HU) and outcomes of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) are correlated. Is correlation powerful enough to give us direct information about maxillary resistance to RME?

Materials and methods: Twenty-two computed tomographic (CT) scans (14 years) are used in this archive study. Two CT records were collected, one before RME (T1) and one after 3 months of retention period (T2). Maxillary measurements were made using dental and skeletal landmarks in first molar and first premolar slides to measure the effects of RME. Density of midpalatal suture (MPSD) and segments of maxillary bone is measured in HU at T1. Correlation analysis was conducted between density measurements and maxillary variables. Regression analysis was then performed for variables that showed positive correlation.

Results: There was no correlation between density and skeletal measurements. Intermolar angle (ImA) in molar slice showed statistically significant correlation with density measurements. The ImA variable showed the highest correlation with MPSD in frontal section (r = 0.669, P < .01).

Conclusions: There is correlation of 32.1-43.3% between density measurements and ImA increase. Our density measurements explain a certain percentage of ImA increase, but density is not the only and definitive indicator of changes after RME.

Keywords: Hounsfield Units; Rapid maxillary expansion; Suture density.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1. Dental and skeletal measurements.
Figure 1.
Dental and skeletal measurements.
Figure 2. Measuring ANS width postexpansion.
Figure 2.
Measuring ANS width postexpansion.
Figure 3. MPSD axial measurements at points A, P1, P2, and P3.
Figure 3.
MPSD axial measurements at points A, P1, P2, and P3.
Figure 4. MPSD frontal measurement at P2.
Figure 4.
MPSD frontal measurement at P2.
Figure 5. Maxillary buttress 3D model shown with cutting planes (a: anterior; b: middle; c: posterior).
Figure 5.
Maxillary buttress 3D model shown with cutting planes (a: anterior; b: middle; c: posterior).
Figure 6. (a) Midpalatal suture 3D model shown before removal of vomer. (b) Oblique view.
Figure 6.
(a) Midpalatal suture 3D model shown before removal of vomer. (b) Oblique view.

References

    1. Timms DJ. Rapid Maxillary Expansion. Chicago, Ill: Quintessence Publishing; 1981. pp. 91–94.
    1. Acheson RM. A method of assessing skeletal maturity from radiographs; a report from the Oxford child health survey. J Anat. 1954;88:498–508. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Litsas G, Ari-Demirkaya A. Growth indicators in orthodontic patients. Part 2: comparison of cervical bone age to hand-wrist skeletal age. Relationship with chronological age. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2010;11:176–180. - PubMed
    1. Wehrbein H, Yildizhan F. The mid-palatal suture in young adults. A radiological-histological investigation. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23:105–114. - PubMed
    1. Walker L, Enciso R, Mah J. Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:418–423. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms