Periviable birth: executive summary of a joint workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
- PMID: 24785861
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000243
Periviable birth: executive summary of a joint workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Abstract
This is an executive summary of a workshop on the management and counseling issues of women anticipated to deliver at a periviable gestation (broadly defined as 20 0/7 through 25 6/7 weeks of gestation), and the treatment options for the newborn. Upon review of the available literature, the workshop panel noted that the rates of neonatal survival and neurodevelopmental disabilities among the survivors vary greatly across the periviable gestations and are significantly influenced by the obstetric and neonatal management practices (eg, antenatal steroid, tocolytic agents, and antibiotic administration; cesarean birth; and local protocols for perinatal care, neonatal resuscitation, and intensive care support). These are, in turn, influenced by the variations in local and regional definitions of limits of viability. Because of the complexities in making difficult management decisions, obstetric and neonatal teams should confer prior to meeting with the family, when feasible. Family counseling should be coordinated with the goal of creating mutual trust, respect, and understanding and should incorporate evidence-based counseling methods. Since clinical circumstances can change rapidly with increasing gestational age, counseling should include discussion of the benefits and risks of various maternal and neonatal interventions at the time of counseling. There should be a plan for follow-up counseling as clinical circumstances evolve. The panel proposed a research agenda and recommended developing educational curricula on the care and counseling of families facing the birth of a periviable infant.
Comment in
-
Periviable birth: executive summary of a joint workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;124(3):635. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000439. Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 25162271 No abstract available.
-
In Reply: Dr. Perlman.Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;124(3):635-636. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000440. Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 25162272 No abstract available.
References
-
- Campbell DE, Fleischman AR. Limits of viability: dilemmas, decisions, and decision makers. Am J Perinatol 2001;18:117–28.
-
- Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 38. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:617–24.
-
- MacDonald H; American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2002;110:1024–7.
-
- Batton DG; Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Clinical report—antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation at an extremely low gestational age. Pediatrics 2009;124:422–7.
-
- Pignotti MS. The definition of human viability: a historical perspective. Acta Paediatr 2010;99:33–6.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical