Race, ethnicity, and sex affect risk for polyps >9 mm in average-risk individuals
- PMID: 24786894
- PMCID: PMC4121117
- DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.04.037
Race, ethnicity, and sex affect risk for polyps >9 mm in average-risk individuals
Abstract
Background & aims: Colorectal cancer risk differs based on patient demographics. We aimed to measure the prevalence of significant colorectal polyps in average-risk individuals and to determine differences based on age, sex, race, or ethnicity.
Methods: In a prospective study, colonoscopy data were collected, using an endoscopic report generator, from 327,785 average-risk adults who underwent colorectal cancer screening at 84 gastrointestinal practice sites from 2000 to 2011. Demographic characteristics included age, sex, race, and ethnicity. The primary outcome was the presence of suspected malignancy or large polyp(s) >9 mm. The benchmark risk for age to initiate screening was based on white men, 50-54 years old.
Results: Risk of large polyps and tumors increased progressively in men and women with age. Women had lower risks than men in every age group, regardless of race. Blacks had higher risk than whites from ages 50 through 65 years and Hispanics had lower risk than whites from ages 50 through 80 years. The prevalence of large polyps was 6.2% in white men 50-54 years old. The risk was similar among the groups of white women 65-69 years old, black women 55-59 years old, black men 50-54 years old, Hispanic women 70-74 years old, and Hispanic men 55-59 years old. The risk of proximal large polyps increased with age, female sex, and black race.
Conclusions: There are differences in the prevalence and location of large polyps and tumors in average-risk individuals based on age, sex, race, and ethnicity. These findings could be used to select ages at which specific groups should begin colorectal cancer screening.
Keywords: CRC; Colon Cancer; Early Detection; Rate.
Copyright © 2014 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures: Dr. Lieberman is the executive director of CORI, a non-profit organization that receives funding from federal and industry sources. This potential conflict of interest has been reviewed and managed by the OHSU and Portland VA Conflict of Interest in Research Committees. All other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Comment in
-
Tailoring colonoscopic screening to individual risk.Gastroenterology. 2014 Aug;147(2):264-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Jun 26. Gastroenterology. 2014. PMID: 24976032 No abstract available.
-
Reply: To PMID 24786894.Gastroenterology. 2014 Dec;147(6):1441. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.10.034. Epub 2014 Oct 27. Gastroenterology. 2014. PMID: 25449027 No abstract available.
-
Race in colorectal cancer screening strategies: a solid determinant factor or a "moving target"?Gastroenterology. 2014 Dec;147(6):1440. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.044. Epub 2014 Oct 27. Gastroenterology. 2014. PMID: 25450084 No abstract available.
References
-
- Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, et al. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1670–1677. - PubMed
-
- Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:162–168. - PubMed
-
- Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:169–174. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
