The impact of unplanned postprocedure visits in the management of patients with urinary stones
- PMID: 24787103
- PMCID: PMC4586158
- DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.013
The impact of unplanned postprocedure visits in the management of patients with urinary stones
Abstract
Background: Unplanned follow-up care is the focus of intense health policy interest, as evidenced by recent financial penalties imposed under the Affordable Care Act. To date, however, unplanned postoperative care remains poorly characterized, particularly for patients with kidney stones. Our objective was to describe the frequency, variation, and financial impact of unplanned, high-acuity, follow-up visits in the treatment of patients with urinary stone disease.
Methods: We identified privately insured patients undergoing percutaneous nephrostolithotomy, ureteroscopy, or shock-wave lithotripsy for stone disease. The primary outcome was occurrence of an emergency department visit or hospital admission within 30 days of the procedure. Multivariable models estimated the odds of an unplanned visit and the incremental cost of those visits, controlling for important covariates.
Results: We identified 93,523 initial procedures to fragment or remove stones. Overall, 1 in 7 patients had an unplanned postprocedural visit. Unplanned visits were least common after shock-wave lithotripsy (12%) and occurred with similar frequency after ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (15%). Procedures at high-volume facilities were substantially less likely to result in an unplanned visit (odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.74-0.87, P < .001). When an unplanned visit occurred, adjusted incremental expenditures per episode were greater after shock-wave lithotripsy ($32,156 [95% CI $30,453-33,859]) than after ureteroscopy ($23,436 [95% CI $22,281-24,590]).
Conclusion: Patients not infrequently experience an unplanned, high-acuity visit after low-risk procedures to remove urinary stones, and the cost of these encounters is substantial. Interventions are indicated to identify and reduce preventable unplanned visits.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy/holmium laser lithotripsy: cost and outcome analysis.J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):1012-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.021. Epub 2009 Jul 18. J Urol. 2009. PMID: 19616804
-
Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Pediatric Urolithiasis.J Urol. 2016 Jul;196(1):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2975. Epub 2016 Mar 17. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 26997313 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative Emergency Department Visits After Urinary Stone Surgery: Variation Based on Surgical Modality.J Endourol. 2020 Jan;34(1):93-98. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0399. Epub 2019 Dec 18. J Endourol. 2020. PMID: 31691596
-
Management options for lower pole renal calculi.Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Mar;18(2):214-9. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f517ea. Curr Opin Urol. 2008. PMID: 18303547 Review.
-
Changing surgical aspects of urinary stone disease.Surg Clin North Am. 1988 Oct;68(5):1085-104. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)44638-4. Surg Clin North Am. 1988. PMID: 3051454 Review.
Cited by
-
The association of dietary intake of riboflavin and thiamine with kidney stone: a cross-sectional survey of NHANES 2007-2018.BMC Public Health. 2023 May 26;23(1):964. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15817-2. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37237348 Free PMC article.
-
Size matters: The width and location of a ureteral stone accurately predict the chance of spontaneous passage.Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4775-4785. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4852-6. Epub 2017 Jun 7. Eur Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28593428 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing health literacy and subsequent implementation of an animated video to enhance understanding for patients with nephrolithiasis.Curr Urol. 2024 Dec;18(4):295-300. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000172. Epub 2024 Dec 20. Curr Urol. 2024. PMID: 40256297 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital volume in ureterorenoscopic stone treatment: 99 operations per year could increase the chance of a better outcome-results of the German prospective multicentre BUSTER project.World J Urol. 2019 Apr;37(4):743-749. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2431-3. Epub 2018 Aug 9. World J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30094717
-
Urinary Stone Disease: Advancing Knowledge, Patient Care, and Population Health.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Jul 7;11(7):1305-1312. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13251215. Epub 2016 Mar 10. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016. PMID: 26964844 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1817–23. - PubMed
-
- Litwin MS, Saigal C, editors. Urologic Diseases in America. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; US Government Printing Office; Washington, DC: 2012. NIH Publication No. 12-7865.
-
- Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1418–28. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical