Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 10;53(24):6080-4.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201402011. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

Ester carbonyl vibration as a sensitive probe of protein local electric field

Ileana M Pazos  1 , Ayanjeet Ghosh, Matthew J Tucker, Feng Gai
Affiliations

Ester carbonyl vibration as a sensitive probe of protein local electric field

Ileana M Pazos et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

The ability to quantify the local electrostatic environment of proteins and protein/peptide assemblies is key to gaining a microscopic understanding of many biological interactions and processes. Herein, we show that the ester carbonyl stretching vibration of two non-natural amino acids, L-aspartic acid 4-methyl ester and L-glutamic acid 5-methyl ester, is a convenient and sensitive probe in this regard, since its frequency correlates linearly with the local electrostatic field for both hydrogen-bonding and non-hydrogen-bonding environments. We expect that the resultant frequency-electric-field map will find use in various applications. Furthermore, we show that, when situated in a non-hydrogen-bonding environment, this probe can also be used to measure the local dielectric constant (ε). For example, its application to amyloid fibrils formed by Aβ(16-22) revealed that the interior of such β-sheet assemblies has an ε value of approximately 5.6.

Keywords: IR spectroscopy; carbonyl groups; hydrogen bonds; protein electrostatics; vibrational probes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Normalized FTIR spectra of MA and MP obtained in different solvents, as indicated. The concentration of the solute in each case was 20 mM and normalization is based on the integrated area of the band obtained in hexane (i.e., the spectra collected in other solvents were scaled so that their integrated areas are equal to that obtained in hexane). For MA in hexane, the peak absorbance was measured to be 0.0715, which gives rise to a molar extinction coefficient of 650 M-1 cm-1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Center frequencies of the carbonyl stretching vibrations of MA (circles) and MP (squares) versus calculated local electric field for different solvents (represented by the same colors as those used in Figure 1). The solid lines are the best fits of these data to the linear equations indicated in the figure.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Offset FTIR spectra in the ester C=O stretching region of DM-P, MA, EM-P, and MP in different solvents, as indicated. The peptide concentrations were 2 mM and, in each case, the spectrum of the model compound has been normalized with respect to that of the corresponding peptide.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Normalized stretching vibrational bands of the ester carbonyl of 15 mM Aβ-DM obtained immediately after the sample was prepared, after 7 days of incubation in D2O, and also in the form of a dried film (dried under a flow of nitrogen for 7 days), as indicated. The band obtained with the dry film can be decomposed into 3 Gaussians (grey dashed lines) with the center frequencies given in the text.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Suydam IT, Snow CD, Pande VS, Boxer SG. Science. 2006;313:200–204. - PubMed
    2. Ragain CM, Newberry RW, Ritchie AW, Webb LJ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2012;116:9326–9336. - PubMed
    1. Boxer SG. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009;113:2972–2983. - PubMed
    1. Kim H, Cho M. Chem. Rev. 2013:5817–5847. - PubMed
    1. Volk M, Kholodenko Y, Lu HSM, Gooding EA, DeGrado WF, Hochstrasser RM. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997;101:8607–8616.
    2. Schkolnik G, Utesch T, Salewski J, Tenger K, Millo D, Kranich A, Zebger I, Schulz C, Zimanyi L, Rakhely G, Mroginski MA, Hildebrandt P. Chem. Commun. 2012;48:70–72. - PubMed
    3. Chung JK, Thielges MC, Fayer MD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:12118–12124. - PMC - PubMed
    4. Walker DM, Hayes EC, Webb LJ. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013;15:12241–12252. - PubMed
    1. Dyer RB, Gai F, Woodruff WH. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998;31:709–716.
    2. Woutersen S, Pfister R, Hamm P, Mu YG, Kosov DS, Stock G. J. Chem. Phys. 2002;117:6833–6840.
    3. Demirdoven N, Cheatum CM, Chung HS, Khalil M, Knoester J, Tokmakoff A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:7981–7990. - PubMed
    4. Waegele MM, Culik RM, Gai F. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011;2:2598–2609. - PMC - PubMed
    5. Serrano AL, Waegele MM, Gai F. Protein Sci. 2012;21:157–170. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources