Early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence in patients undergoing surgery with curative intent: current status and challenges
- PMID: 24790654
- PMCID: PMC3982039
- DOI: 10.7150/jca.7988
Early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence in patients undergoing surgery with curative intent: current status and challenges
Abstract
Despite advances in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, attention to proper surgical technique, and improved pathological staging for both the primary and metastatic lesions, almost half of all colorectal cancer patients will develop recurrent disease. More concerning, this includes ~25% of patients with theoretically curable node-negative, non-metastatic Stage I and II disease. Given the annual incidence of colorectal cancer, approximately 150,000 new patients are candidates each year for follow-up surveillance. When combined with the greater population already enrolled in a surveillance protocol, this translates to a tremendous number of patients at risk for recurrence. It is therefore imperative that strategies aim for detection of recurrence as early as possible to allow initiation of treatment that may still result in cure. Yet, controversy exists regarding the optimal surveillance strategy (high-intensity vs. traditional), ideal testing regimen, and overall effectiveness. While benefits may involve earlier detection of recurrence, psychological welfare improvement, and greater overall survival, this must be weighed against the potential disadvantages including more invasive tests, higher rates of reoperation, and increased costs. In this review, we will examine the current options available and challenges surrounding colorectal cancer surveillance and early detection of recurrence.
Keywords: CEA; EUS; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; recurrence.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
References
-
- American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2011-2013. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2011.
-
- Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B. et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1865–1871. - PubMed
-
- Desch CE, Benson AB Somerfield MR. et al. Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Scoiety of Clinical Oncology Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8512–8519. - PubMed
-
- Scholl HJ, VanCutsem E, Stein A. et al. ESMO Consensus guidelines fo rthe management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2479–2516. - PubMed
-
- Poston GJ, Tait D, Oconnell S. et al. Diagnosis andmangement of colorectal cancer: summary of NICE guideance. BMJ. 2011;343:1–4. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical