Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Mar 16;5(4):272-80.
doi: 10.7150/jca.8871. eCollection 2014.

Future directions for the early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence

Affiliations
Review

Future directions for the early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence

Avery S Walker et al. J Cancer. .

Abstract

Surgical resection remains a mainstay of treatment and is highly effective for localized colorectal cancer. However, ~30-40% of patients develop recurrence following surgery and 40-50% of recurrences are apparent within the first few years after initial surgical resection. Several variables factor into the ultimate outcome of these patients, including the extent of disease, tumor biology, and patient co-morbidities. Additionally, the time from initial treatment to the development of recurrence is strongly associated with overall survival, particularly in patients who recur within one year of their surgical resection. Current post-resection surveillance strategies involve physical examination, laboratory, endoscopic and imaging studies utilizing various high and low-intensity protocols. Ultimately, the goal is to detect recurrence as early as possible, and ideally in the asymptomatic localized phase, to allow initiation of treatment that may still result in cure. While current strategies have been effective, several efforts are evolving to improve our ability to identify recurrent disease at its earliest phase. Our aim with this article is to briefly review the options available and, more importantly, examine emerging and future options to assist in the early detection of colon and rectal cancer recurrence.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer; biomarkers.; recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 12-month Bayesian Belief Network. Each box in the figure represents a feature within the study data set, the edges represent patterns of dependence between features. This allows an estimate of mortality based on the different combinations. (With Permission, Springer Publishing)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Indigo carmine chromoendoscopy showing mucosal alteration in the sigmoid: (a) before staining and (b) after staining. (With permission Oxford University Press).
Figure 3
Figure 3
High Resolution Endoscopy (A) and Auto Fluorescence Imaging (B) of a flat and depressed type of colon cancer with submucosal invasion not seen on HRE. (With Permission, InTech Publishing).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chang GJ, Kaiser AM, Mills S, Rafferty JF, Buie WD. Practice parameters for the management of colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(8):831–843. - PubMed
    1. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(11):1783–1799. - PubMed
    1. Seo SI, Lim SB, Yoon YS. et al. Comparison of recurrence patterns between </=5 years and >5 years after curative operations in colorectal cancer patients. J Surg Oncol. 2013;108(1):9–13. - PubMed
    1. Cortet M, Grimault A, Cheynel N, Lepage C, Bouvier A, Faivre J. Patterns of recurrence of obstructing colon cancers after surgery for cure: a population-based study. Colorectal Dis. 2013. - PubMed
    1. Paty PB, Nash GM, Baron P. et al. Long-term results of local excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;236(4):522–529. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources