Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;6(3):197-202.
doi: 10.1177/1941738114522412.

Relationship of the functional movement screen in-line lunge to power, speed, and balance measures

Affiliations

Relationship of the functional movement screen in-line lunge to power, speed, and balance measures

Erin H Hartigan et al. Sports Health. 2014 May.

Abstract

Background: The in-line lunge of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) evaluates lateral stability, balance, and movement asymmetries. Athletes who score poorly on the in-line lunge should avoid activities requiring power or speed until scores are improved, yet relationships between the in-line lunge scores and other measures of balance, power, and speed are unknown.

Hypothesis: (1) Lunge scores will correlate with center of pressure (COP), maximum jump height (MJH), and 36.6-meter sprint time and (2) there will be no differences between limbs on lunge scores, MJH, or COP.

Study design: Descriptive laboratory study.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Methods: Thirty-seven healthy, active participants completed the first 3 tasks of the FMS (eg, deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge), unilateral drop jumps, and 36.6-meter sprints. A 3-dimensional motion analysis system captured MJH. Force platforms measured COP excursion. A laser timing system measured 36.6-m sprint time. Statistical analyses were used to determine whether a relationship existed between lunge scores and COP, MJH, and 36.6-m speed (Spearman rho tests) and whether differences existed between limbs in lunge scores (Wilcoxon signed-rank test), MJH, and COP (paired t tests).

Results: Lunge scores were not significantly correlated with COP, MJH, or 36.6-m sprint time. Lunge scores, COP excursion, and MJH were not statistically different between limbs.

Conclusion: Performance on the FMS in-line lunge was not related to balance, power, or speed. Healthy participants were symmetrical in lunging measures and MJH.

Clinical relevance: Scores on the FMS in-line lunge should not be attributed to power, speed, or balance performance without further examination. However, assessing limb symmetry appears to be clinically relevant.

Keywords: limb dominance; screening; symmetry; unilateral.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following author declared potential conflicts of interest: Erin Hartigan received a grant and consulting fees or honorarium from UNE.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Functional Movement Screen in-line scoring criteria outline.

References

    1. Baechle TE. Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2008
    1. Ben Kazman J, Galecki J, Lisman P, Deuster PA, O’Connor FG. Factor structure of the Functional Movement Screen in Marine officer candidates [published online August 5, 2013]. J Strength Cond Res. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a6dd83 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bodden JG, Needham RA, Chockalingam N. The effect of an intervention program on Functional Movement Screen test scores in mixed martial arts athletes [published online July 15, 2013]. J Strength Cond Res. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a480bf - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butler RJ, Plisky PJ, Southers C, Scoma C, Kiesel KB. Biomechanical analysis of the different classifications of the Functional Movement Screen deep squat test. Sports Biomech. 2010;9:270-279 - PubMed
    1. Chapman RF, Laymon AS, Arnold T. Functional movement scores and longitudinal performance outcomes in elite track and field athletes [published online April 23, 2013]. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. - PubMed