Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 1;24(2):192-212.
doi: 10.1177/1049731513505778.

A Systematic Review of Strategies for Implementing Empirically Supported Mental Health Interventions

Byron J Powell  1 , Enola K Proctor  1 , Joseph E Glass  2
Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Strategies for Implementing Empirically Supported Mental Health Interventions

Byron J Powell et al. Res Soc Work Pract. .

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review examines experimental studies that test the effectiveness of strategies intended to integrate empirically supported mental health interventions into routine care settings. Our goal was to characterize the state of the literature and to provide direction for future implementation studies.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using electronic databases and a manual search.

Results: Eleven studies were identified that tested implementation strategies with a randomized (n = 10) or controlled clinical trial design (n = 1). The wide range of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes evaluated precluded meta-analysis. However, the majority of studies (n = 7; 64%) found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome.

Conclusions: There is a clear need for more rigorous research on the effectiveness of implementation strategies, and we provide several suggestions that could improve this research area.

Keywords: empirically supported interventions; evidence-based treatments; implementation research; implementation strategies; mental health services research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual model of implementation research (Proctor et al., 2009)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic of search and exclusion process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Aarons GA, Horowitz JD, Dlugosz LR, Ehrhart MG. The role of organizational processes in dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 128–153.
    1. Albrecht L, Archibald M, Arseneau D, Scott SD. Development of a checklist to assess the quality of reporting of knowledge translation interventions using the Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research (WIDER) recommendations. Implementation Science. 2013;8(52):1–5. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-52. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander JA, Hearld LR. Methods and metrics challenges of delivery-systems research. Implementation Science. 2012;7(15):1–11. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-15. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychological Association. Report of the 2005 presidential task force on evidence-based practice. Washington, D. C: 2005. pp. 1–28.
    1. Asarnow JR, Jaycox LH, Duan N, LaBorde AP, Rea MM, Murray P, Wells KB. Effectiveness of a quality improvement intervention for adolescent depression in primary care clinics: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293(3):311–319. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.3.311. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources