Jezebel at the welfare office: How racialized stereotypes of poor women's reproductive decisions and relationships shape policy implementation
- PMID: 24791134
- PMCID: PMC4002050
- DOI: 10.1080/10875549.2013.833159
Jezebel at the welfare office: How racialized stereotypes of poor women's reproductive decisions and relationships shape policy implementation
Abstract
Current welfare scholarship lacks an analysis of how caseworkers discuss sexuality-related issues with clients. Seventy-two of 232 transcribed welfare interviews in three states included discussion of reproductive decisions and relationships. Overall, caseworkers' language reflected negative myths regarding African American women's sexuality and motherhood. By virtue of their status as welfare recipients, regardless of their individual races, clients were placed into racialized myths through workers' talk. This analysis demonstrates that though not present in every welfare interview and often veiled in bureaucratic language, negative ideas about poor women's sexuality persist in welfare policy and are deeply embedded in its day-to-day implementation.
Keywords: gender; qualitative research; race; sexuality; welfare reform.
Similar articles
-
Controlling images and standards of beauty shapes body image: using a relational cultural approach to improve Black American women's well-being.Ethn Health. 2024 Oct;29(7):861-879. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2024.2378320. Epub 2024 Jul 24. Ethn Health. 2024. PMID: 39048382 Review.
-
Child welfare workers: who they are and how they view the child welfare system.Child Welfare. 2006 Jan-Feb;85(1):83-103. Child Welfare. 2006. PMID: 16596828
-
An investigation of Jezebel stereotype awareness, gendered racial identity and sexual beliefs and behaviours among Black adult women.Cult Health Sex. 2022 Apr;24(4):517-532. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2020.1863471. Epub 2021 Jan 29. Cult Health Sex. 2022. PMID: 33512297
-
Race, welfare reform and caseworkers' treatment of welfare recipients: an examination of an alternative service delivery system-the Wisconsin Works (W-2) Program.J Health Soc Policy. 2006;22(1):39-57. doi: 10.1300/J045v22n01_04. J Health Soc Policy. 2006. PMID: 17135108
-
Changing factors and changing needs in women's health care.Nurs Clin North Am. 1986 Mar;21(1):111-23. Nurs Clin North Am. 1986. PMID: 3513129 Review.
Cited by
-
A recipe for systems change: Predictive modeling and street-level bureaucracy among homeless services.PLoS One. 2025 Aug 21;20(8):e0328822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328822. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40839567 Free PMC article.
-
Digital health equity frameworks and key concepts: a scoping review.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):932-944. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf017. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025. PMID: 39936843 Free PMC article.
-
Protect and Control: Coverture's Logics Across Welfare Policy and Abortion Law.Psychol Women Q. 2023 Dec;47(4):478-493. doi: 10.1177/03616843231186320. Epub 2023 Jul 19. Psychol Women Q. 2023. PMID: 38606316 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abramovitz Mimi. Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present. South End Press; Boston, MA: 1996.
-
- Alexander Michelle. The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New Press; New York, NY: 2010.
-
- Annie E, Casey Foundation . Kids Count Databook. Author; Baltimore, MD: 2003.
-
- Berkowitz Edward D. America's welfare state: From Roosevelt to Reagan. Johns Hopkins University Press; Baltimore, MD: 1991.
-
- Bonilla-Silva Eduardo. Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield; Lanham, MD: 2006.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources