Comparison of 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional laparoscopic vision system in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study
- PMID: 24791965
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3253-1
Comparison of 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional laparoscopic vision system in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study
Abstract
Purpose: We compare the results of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) operations conducted using standard 2-D and 3-D high definition laparoscopic vision systems and discuss the findings with regard to the recent literature.
Methods: Data from 147 patients who underwent TLH operations with 2-D or 3-D high definition laparoscopic vision systems in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, during 2 year period between December 2010 and December 2012, were reviewed retrospectively. TLH operations were divided into two groups as those performed using 2-D, and those performed using 3-D high definition laparoscopic vision systems.
Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the operation times (p = 0.037 < 0.05). The mean operation time of the 2-D laparoscopy group (134.2 ± 61.8 min) was higher than the 3-D laparoscopy group (116.8 ± 38.5 min). No statistically significant difference was found between the 2-D and 3-D groups with respect to major, minor and total complication rates (p = 0.641 > 0.05). The operation time among obese patients was significantly shorter in those in the 3-D laparoscopy group than those in the 2-D group (p = 0.041 < 0.05).
Conclusions: Recent literature indicates that 3-D laparoscopy vision system needs to be utilized more often and a higher number of ex vivo and in vivo studies have to be conducted. Furthermore, we believe that the prevalent problems encountered during laparoscopy can be overcome by the development of real-time vision devices and the appropriate training of the laparoscopists. 3-D high definition laparoscopic vision system will help to improve surgical performance and outcome of patients undergoing gynecological minimal invasive surgery.
Similar articles
-
Surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional laparoscopic surgical systems.Fukushima J Med Sci. 2018 Apr 17;64(1):38-45. doi: 10.5387/fms.2017-22. Epub 2018 Mar 15. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 29540624 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic hysterectomy in the overweight and obese: does 3D imaging make a change?Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Jan;295(1):125-131. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4215-6. Epub 2016 Oct 13. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017. PMID: 27734147
-
Abdominal, multi-port and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: eleven-year trends comparison of surgical outcomes complications of 936 cases.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3576-y. Epub 2014 Dec 9. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015. PMID: 25488157
-
A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of 2D Versus 3D Laparoscopy in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Large Uteri (≥ 500g).Surg Technol Int. 2018 Nov 11;33:38-43. Surg Technol Int. 2018. PMID: 30117137 Review.
-
Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for the larger uterus (>500 g): a case series and literature review.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Feb;295(2):397-405. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4237-0. Epub 2016 Nov 15. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017. PMID: 27848016 Review.
Cited by
-
4K versus 3D total laparoscopic hysterectomy by resident in training: a prospective randomised trial.Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021 Sep;13(3):221-229. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.3.027. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021. PMID: 34555876 Free PMC article.
-
Safety of Three-Dimensional versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 29;19(21):14163. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114163. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36361054 Free PMC article.
-
Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopy in surgical efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 25;7(43):70979-70990. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10916. Oncotarget. 2016. PMID: 27486967 Free PMC article.
-
Two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for vaginal cuff closure by surgeons-in-training: a randomized controlled trial.Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1237-1243. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06886-9. Epub 2019 Jun 6. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31172324 Clinical Trial.
-
3-dimensional versus conventional laparoscopy for benign hysterectomy: protocol for a randomized clinical trial.BMC Womens Health. 2017 Sep 7;17(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0434-7. BMC Womens Health. 2017. PMID: 28882141 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical