A "PSA pyramid" for men with initial prostate-specific antigen ≤3 ng/ml: a plea for individualized prostate cancer screening
- PMID: 24794075
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.005
A "PSA pyramid" for men with initial prostate-specific antigen ≤3 ng/ml: a plea for individualized prostate cancer screening
Abstract
Background: In daily routine business, various prostate-specific antigen (PSA) retest strategies are being promoted.
Objective: To investigate rescreening intervals according to baseline PSA <3 ng/ml stratified by any and aggressive prostate cancer (PCa).
Design, setting, and participants: From 1998 to 2012, data from 4350 men aged 55-70 yr were analyzed from a population-based prospective screening study (median follow-up: 11.6 yr).
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary end point was detection of aggressive PCa (Gleason score 7-10). Cox regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between covariates.
Results and limitations: Baseline PSA of <1.0 ng/ml, 1-1.9 ng/ml, and 2-2.9 ng/ml was present in 2416 men (55.5%: group 1), 1371 men (31.6%: group 2), and 563 men (12.9%: group 3), respectively. Stratified according to these PSA groups, aggressive PCa was detected in 25 patients (1.0%), 80 patients (5.8%), and 34 patients (6.0%), respectively. During 4 yr, these numbers were 0.0%, 0.29%, and 1.8%, whereas during 8 yr, the numbers were 0.2%, 1.4%, and 2.5%, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the only independent risk factor for aggressive PCa was baseline PSA (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.82-9.61; p<0.0001, group 2 vs group 1; and HR: 7.33; 95% CI, 4.29-12.52; p<0.0001, group 3 vs group 1).
Conclusions: Baseline PSA was the only predictor regarding aggressive PCa. According to the low rate of potentially missed PCa in these groups, rescreening intervals can be safely adapted to baseline PSA values corresponding to a "PSA pyramid": 6-8 yr if baseline PSA is <1.0 ng/ml, 3-4 yr if baseline PSA is 1-1.99 ng/ml, and yearly if baseline PSA is 2-2.99 ng/ml.
Patient summary: We observed men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value ≤3 ng/ml during 12 yr and found that men can be retested according to their initial PSA value ("PSA pyramid"): PSA <1 (base), retest interval every 8 yr; PSA 1-2 (center), retest interval every 4 yr; and PSA 2-3 (top), retest yearly after risk stratification.
Keywords: Early detection; Prostate cancer; Screening; Screening interval; Survival.
Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Toward a smarter prostate cancer screening program.Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):598-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 15. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 24836056 No abstract available.
-
Prostate cancer: Rescreening policies and risk calculators.Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Aug;11(8):429-30. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.142. Epub 2014 Jul 1. Nat Rev Urol. 2014. PMID: 24980199 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Baseline Prostate-specific Antigen Level in Midlife and Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Black Men.Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):399-407. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Sep 17. Eur Urol. 2019. PMID: 30237027 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the Specificity of Screening for Lethal Prostate Cancer Using Prostate-specific Antigen and a Panel of Kallikrein Markers: A Nested Case-Control Study.Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Feb 11. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25682340 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):728-733. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Oct 21. Eur Urol. 2016. PMID: 26497924
-
Utility of PSA free-to-total ratio for clinically significant prostate cancer in men with a PSA level of <4 ng/mL.BJU Int. 2025 Apr;135(4):550-556. doi: 10.1111/bju.16597. Epub 2024 Nov 28. BJU Int. 2025. PMID: 39607059 Review.
-
Overdetection in screening for prostate cancer.Curr Opin Urol. 2014 May;24(3):256-63. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000054. Curr Opin Urol. 2014. PMID: 24670870 Review.
Cited by
-
Serum markers in prostate cancer detection.Curr Opin Urol. 2015 Jan;25(1):59-64. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000128. Curr Opin Urol. 2015. PMID: 25393274 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prostate cancer screening: and yet it moves!Asian J Androl. 2015 May-Jun;17(3):437-8. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.143310. Asian J Androl. 2015. PMID: 25532573 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 17;8(44):77975-77989. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20316. eCollection 2017 Sep 29. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 29100440 Free PMC article.
-
Au-Ag assembled on silica nanoprobes for visual semiquantitative detection of prostate-specific antigen.J Nanobiotechnology. 2021 Mar 12;19(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-00817-4. J Nanobiotechnology. 2021. PMID: 33712008 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate cancer risk assessment in men with an initial P.S.A. below 3 ng/mL: results from the Göteborg randomized population-based prostate cancer screening trial.Scand J Urol. 2018 Aug;52(4):256-262. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1508166. Epub 2018 Sep 21. Scand J Urol. 2018. PMID: 30241447 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous